Vaccine
Volume 33, Issue 28, Pages 3159-3262 (22 June 2015)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0264410X/33

.
Vaccination errors reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, (VAERS) United States, 2000–2013
Original Research Article
Pages 3171-3178
Beth F. Hibbs, Pedro L. Moro, Paige Lewis, Elaine R. Miller, Tom T. Shimabukuro
Abstract
Importance
Vaccination errors are preventable events. Errors can have impacts including inadequate immunological protection, possible injury, cost, inconvenience, and reduced confidence in the healthcare delivery system.
Objectives
To describe vaccination error reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and identify opportunities for prevention.
Methods
We conducted descriptive analyses using data from VAERS, the U.S. spontaneous surveillance system for adverse events following immunization. The VAERS database was searched from 2000 through 2013 for U.S. reports describing vaccination errors and reports were categorized into 11 error groups. We analyzed numbers and types of vaccination error reports, vaccines involved, reporting trends over time, and descriptions of errors for selected reports.
Results
We identified 20,585 vaccination error reports documenting 21,843 errors. Annual reports increased from 10 in 2000 to 4324 in 2013. The most common error group was “Inappropriate Schedule” (5947; 27%); human papillomavirus (quadrivalent) (1516) and rotavirus (880) vaccines were most frequently involved. “Storage and Dispensing” errors (4983; 23%) included mostly expired vaccine administered (2746) and incorrect storage of vaccine (2202). “Wrong Vaccine Administered” errors (3372; 15%) included mix-ups between vaccines with similar antigens such as varicella/herpes zoster (shingles), DTaP/Tdap, and pneumococcal conjugate/polysaccharide. For error reports with an adverse health event (5204; 25% of total), 92% were classified as non-serious. We also identified 936 vaccination error clusters (i.e., same error, multiple patients, in a common setting) involving over 6141 patients. The most common error in clusters was incorrect storage of vaccine (582 clusters and more than 1715 patients).
Conclusions
Vaccination error reports to VAERS have increased substantially. Contributing factors might include changes in reporting practices, increasing complexity of the immunization schedule, availability of products with similar sounding names or acronyms, and increased attention to storage and temperature lapses. Prevention strategies should be considered.

.
Estimates of pertussis vaccine effectiveness in United States air force pediatric dependents
Original Research Article
Pages 3228-3233
Greg Wolff, Michael Bell, James Escobar, Stefani Ruiz
Abstract
Background
Pertussis vaccination compliance is critical for reduction in the prevalence of disease; however, the current acellular pertussis vaccine may not provide sufficient protection from infection. This study examined acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness (VE) for Air Force dependents less than 12 years of age.
Methods
We conducted a case-control study among Air Force pediatric dependents from 2011 to 2013, comparing cases with positive pertussis test results to controls who received the same lab tests with a negative result. Our study population was categorized by age group and vaccination status based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended pertussis vaccination schedule. VE was calculated with respect to vaccination status and pertussis lab results.
Results
We compared 27 pertussis laboratory positive cases with 974 pertussis laboratory negative controls, 2 months to <12 years old. Comparing completely vaccinated to non-vaccinated patients, the overall VE was 78.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 48.6, 90.8; p < 0.001). VE was highest among those 15 months to <6 years old: 97.6% (95% CI: 78.5, 99.7; p < 0.001). Children 6 to <12 years old had the lowest VE: 48.5% (95% CI: −74.0, 84.7; p = 0.28). Comparing partially vaccinated patients to nonvaccinated patients yielded 64.2% (95% CI: −7.2, 88.1; p = 0.06) overall VE.
Conclusions
Acellular pertussis vaccination was effective at preventing laboratory confirmed pertussis among our Air Force pediatric dependent population, with highest protection among completely vaccinated, young children. Older children received the lowest amount of protection. Partial vaccination had near significant protection. Our overall calculated pertussis VE corroborates other pertussis VE studies looking at similar age groups.