Science
Volume 375| Issue 6582| 18 Feb 2022
https://www.science.org/toc/science/current

Policy Forum
Sovereignty, sanctions, and data sharing under international law
BY Michelle Rourke, Mark Eccleston-Turner, Stephanie Switzer
17 Feb 2022: 724-726
Pathogen samples and scientific data are bargaining chips in a global argument about who gets what in a pandemic
Abstract
In September 2021, after inaugurating the Berlin-based World Health Organization (WHO) Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, German Health Minister Jens Spahn indicated that sanctions might be an appropriate tool to deal with WHO member states that do not cooperate on data sharing during disease outbreaks. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the WHO, affirmed this, stating that “exploring the [idea of ] sanctions may be important” in cases where collaboration fails (¹). Such comments indicate that the WHO Hub has been designed without much consideration of data sovereignty and “access and benefit sharing” (ABS) debates occurring across multiple United Nations (UN) bodies, including the WHO. Threats of sanctions do little to promote the ideals of equity and solidarity often touted as foundational to global health governance. They entrench the idea that pathogen samples and associated data are “bargaining chips” rather than vital inputs to public health research and pandemic response.