Vaccine Injury Claims/Litigation/Education

New England Journal of Medicine
Volume 360 — June 11, 2009 — Number 24
http://content.nejm.org/current.shtml

Perspectives
When Vaccine Injury Claims Go to Court
A. M. Stewart
[First 100 words per NEJM protocol]
In February 2009, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) released decisions for the first three test cases heard under the program’s Omnibus Autism Proceeding. In each of the cases — Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Hazlehurst v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Snyder v. Secretary of Health and Human Services — the petitioners alleged that a child’s autism spectrum disorder was caused by the combination of the measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccine and thimerosal-containing vaccines. The decisions will have a substantial effect on vaccine policy and practice in the United States and will influence the analysis . . .

Litigation, Regulation, and Education — Protecting the Public’s Health through Childhood Immunization
R. D. Silverman

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.