The U.S. Supreme Court heard opening arguments in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, Inc., Docket No. 09-152 involving the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and vaccine manufacturer liability. The case was brought by the family of Hannah Bruesewitz, a Pennsylvania teen whose seizure disorder surfaced after she received a diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine made by Wyeth.
Links to the docket and various briefs are presented below. The Questions Presented summary is presented in full text here:
“Section 22(b)(1) of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 [“the Act”] expressly preempts certain design defect claims against vaccine manufacturers “if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-22(b)(1). A-104.
“The Question Presented is:
Whether the Third Circuit erred in holding that, contrary to its plain text and the decisions of this Court and others, Section 22(b)(1) preempts all vaccine design defect claims, whether the vaccine’s side effects were unavoidable or not?”
http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/oct2010.shtml#09152
Merit briefs
Amicus briefs
– Brief for Marguerite Willner in Support of Petitioner
– Brief for Mark A. Geistfeld in Support of Petitioner
– Brief for Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Respondent
– Brief for United States of America in Support of Respondent
– Brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in Support of Respondent
– Brief for Kenneth W. Starr and Erwin Chemerinsky in Support of Petitioners Urging Reversal