Informing real-world practice with real-world evidence: the value of PRECIS-2

BMC Medicine
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmed/content
(Accessed 26 May 2018)

Commentary
Informing real-world practice with real-world evidence: the value of PRECIS-2
Authors: Gila Neta and Karin E. Johnson
Citation: BMC Medicine 2018 16:76
Published on: 21 May 2018
Abstract
Real-world evidence is needed to inform real-world practice. Pragmatic controlled trials are intended to provide such evidence by assessing the effectiveness of medicines and other interventions in real-world settings, as opposed to explanatory trials that assess efficacy in highly controlled settings. Dal-Ré and colleagues (BMC Med 16:49, 2018) recently performed a literature review of studies published between 2014 and 2017 to assess the degree to which studies that self-identified as pragmatic were truly so. The authors found that over one-third of randomized controlled trials of drugs and biologics that were self-labeled as pragmatic used placebo controls (as opposed to usual care), tested medicines before licensing, or were conducted in a single site. Further, they proposed that, in order to improve the reliability of the ‘pragmatic’ label, investigators should assess their trials using the PRECIS-2 tool upon submission to funders, ethics boards, or journals. We appreciate the value of PRECIS-2 as an indicator to assess the pragmatic versus explanatory features in a trial, and we herein highlight the potential challenges and opportunities that may arise with its systematic and widespread use.