Announcements

Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://alleninstitute.org/what-we-do/frontiers-group/news-press/
Press Release
The Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group Announces New Allen Distinguished Investigators
October 8, 2020
Collaborative projects funded by the awards will address important questions about neurodegenerative disease, nucleus biology, and protein turnover

News
Accelerating Frontier Science | The Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group
October 7, 2020
The Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group seeks pioneers and explorers willing to make big advancements, take risks, ask questions, be tenacious, and have curiosity to change the face of biology.

BARDA – U.S. Department of HHS [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.phe.gov/about/barda/Pages/default.aspx
BARDA News
October 9, 2020: Trump Administration Expands Collaboration with AstraZeneca to Develop and Manufacture an Investigational Monoclonal Antibody to Prevent COVID-19
To meet the Trump Administration’s Operation Warp Speed goals, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Department of Defense (DoD ) today announced an agreement with AstraZeneca for late-stage development and large-scale manufacturing of the company’s COVID-19 investigational product AZD7442, a cocktail of two monoclonal antibodies, that may help treat or prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19.
The goal of AstraZeneca’s partnership with the U.S. Government is to develop a monoclonal antibody cocktail that can help prevent infection. An effective monoclonal antibody that can prevent COVID-19, particularly one that is long-lasting and delivered by intramuscular injection, may be of particular use in certain groups. This includes people who have compromised immune function, those who are over 80 years old, and people undergoing medical treatments that preclude them from receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. If the FDA authorizes use of AZD7442 for prevention of SARS-CoV-2, as outlined in agency guidance, the federal government will distribute the doses at no cost. As is customary with government-purchased medical products, healthcare professionals could charge for the cost of administering the product…

October 6, 2020: HHS funds development of needle-free vaccine administration technology
A patch that could administer vaccines without traditional needles will receive development support from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Under an approximately $22 million, 3-year agreement between the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and Vaxxas – headquartered in Brisbane, Australia with offices in Cambridge, Massachusetts – the company will undertake U.S. and Australian Phase 1 clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an easy-to-use, high-density micro-array patch (HD-MAP) and other development activities for the patch.
“Protecting health and saving lives in public health emergencies such as pandemics often requires rapid, widespread vaccination among large groups of people, which poses multiple logistics challenges,” said BARDA Acting Director Gary Disbrow, Ph.D. “Imagine placing a patch on your arm or leg instead of having to go to a clinic or doctor’s office to get a shot. Not only would needle-free technology simplify vaccination logistics and potentially lower costs, but a self-administered patch also may improve vaccination rates.”…

BMGF – Gates Foundation [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases
Press Releases and Statements
No new digest content identified.

Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.gatesmri.org/
The Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute is a non-profit biotech organization. Our mission is to develop products to fight malaria, tuberculosis, and diarrheal diseases—three major causes of mortality, poverty, and inequality in developing countries. The world has unprecedented scientific tools at its disposal; now is the time to use them to save the lives of the world’s poorest people
No new digest content identified.

CARB-X [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://carb-x.org/
News
10.04.2020  |
CARB-X is funding GangaGen Biotechnologies to develop a new drug to treat pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria
CARB-X is awarding up to US$2.5 million to GangaGen Biotechnologies to develop novel antibacterial proteins, called klebicins, to treat pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae.

CEPI – Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://cepi.net/
Latest News
No new digest content identified.

EDCTP [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.edctp.org/
The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) aims to accelerate the development of new or improved drugs, vaccines, microbicides and diagnostics against HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria as well as other poverty-related and neglected infectious diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, with a focus on phase II and III clinical trials
Latest news
06 October 2020
EDCTP joins the GloPID-R funders network on (re-)emerging infectious diseases

Emory Vaccine Center [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.vaccines.emory.edu/
Vaccine Center News
No new digest content identified.

European Medicines Agency [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/
News & Press Releases 
News: EMA starts second rolling review of a COVID-19 vaccine
Last updated: 06/10/2020
EMA’s human medicines committee (CHMP) has started a ‘rolling review’ of data on a vaccine for COVID-19 known as BNT162b2, which is being developed by BioNTech in collaboration with Pfizer.
The start of the rolling review means that the committee has started evaluating the first batch of data on the vaccine, which come from laboratory studies (non-clinical data). This does not mean that a conclusion can be reached yet on the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, as much of the evidence is still to be submitted to the committee.
The CHMP’s decision to start the rolling review of BNT162b2 is based on preliminary results from non-clinical and early clinical studies in adults which suggest that the vaccine triggers the production of antibodies and T cells (cells of the immune system, the body’s natural defences) that target the virus.
Large-scale clinical trials involving several thousands of people are ongoing…

News: EU regulators fully uphold transparency and independence standards for COVID-19 treatments and vaccines
Last updated: 05/10/2020
[See COVID-19 above for detail]

European Vaccine Initiative [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.euvaccine.eu/
Latest News
No new digest content identified.

FDA [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/default.htm
Press Announcements
October 9, 2020 – Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: Daily Roundup October 9, 2020

October 8, 2020 – Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: Daily Roundup October 8, 2020
:: Today, the FDA updated the dashboard on the Coronavirus Treatment Acceleration Program (CTAP) webpage. As of September 30, 2020, 550+ drug development programs were in planning stages, 350+ trials were reviewed by FDA and 5 COVID-19 treatments were currently authorized for emergency use.

October 8, 2020 – FDA awards six grants to fund new clinical trials to advance the development of medical products for the treatment of rare diseases
:: Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that it has awarded six new clinical trial research grants to principal investigators from academia and industry totaling over $16 million over the next four years. These trial research grants, awarded through the Congressionally-funded Orphan Products Grants Program, enhance the development of medical products for patients with rare diseases.

October 8, 2020 – FDA Reaffirms Commitment to Safety, Security of its Public Health Laboratories

October 7, 2020 – Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: Daily Roundup October 7, 2020
:: The FDA issued a letter to health care providers recommending that health care providers give clear, step-by-step instructions to patients who, in a health care setting, are self-collecting anterior nasal samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Without proper instructions, patients may not collect an adequate sample for testing, which may decrease the sensitivity of the test.

October 6, 2020 – Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: Daily Roundup October 6, 2020
:: Today, the FDA issued guidance with recommendations for vaccine sponsors regarding the scientific data and information that would support issuance of an emergency use authorization (EUA) for investigational vaccines intended to prevent COVID-19.
:: Today, FDA launched a new webpage at www.fda.gov/covid19vaccines to highlight new information as it becomes available.
[See COVID-10 above for detail]

October 5, 2020 – Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: Daily Roundup October 5, 2020

Fondation Merieux [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.fondation-merieux.org/
News, Events
No new digest content identified.

Gavi [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.gavi.org/
News releases
8 October 2020
Japan pledges US$ 130 million to support global access to COVID-19 vaccines
:: Japanese Government pledges US$ 130 million in funding to the Gavi COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC), bringing the total raised to roughly US$ 1.8 billion
:: This brings Gavi even closer to its initial fundraising goal of US$ 2 billion by the end of 2020 to help accelerate and reserve COVID-19 vaccines for low- and middle-income countries, following a series of significant pledges in the past week
:: Seth Berkley: “This vital funding not only helps us ensure lower-income countries aren’t left at the back of the queue when safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines become available, it will also play a vital role in ending the acute phase of this pandemic worldwide”
:: Motegi Toshimitsu, Foreign Minister of Japan. “Japan will contribute more than US $ 130 million for the COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC), in order to enable lower income countries to reinforce equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.”

6 October 2020
Countries pledge nearly US$ 1 billion to support equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines
:: The United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Italy and Sweden pledge approximately US$ 960 million to Gavi’s COVID-19 Vaccines Advance Market Commitment (COVAX AMC)
:: This week’s announcements mean nearly US$ 1.7 billion has been raised towards the effort to ensure equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for low- and middle-income countries, with at least US$ 300 million more urgently needed by end 2020
:: H.E. Issoufou Mahamadou: “I would like to reiterate my support to Gavi and applaud the COVAX initiative as a way to assure universal and fair access to the COVID-19 vaccine.”

GHIT Fund [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.ghitfund.org/newsroom/press
GHIT was set up in 2012 with the aim of developing new tools to tackle infectious diseases that No new digest content identified.

Global Fund [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/news/
News/Updates
Global Fund and Chevron: United Against HIV, TB and Malaria
05 October 2020
The Global Fund and Chevron Corporation have celebrated a 12-year partnership that served as an example of the private sector’s contribution to the fight against infectious diseases and to building resilient health systems.

Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness [GloPID-R] [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.glopid-r.org/news/
News
European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) joins the GloPID-R network
06/10/2020
GloPID-R is delighted to announce that the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) is now a member of the GloPID-R network. The EDCTP will be represented by Pauline Beattie and joins WHO and CEPI as an observer organization.

Hilleman Laboratories [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.hillemanlabs.org/
No new digest content identified.

Human Vaccines Project [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.humanvaccinesproject.org/media/press-releases/
Press Release
‘Comet’ Supercomputer Calculations Boost Our Understanding of Immune System
Oct 08, 2020
SDSC assists Vanderbilt University Human Vaccines Project
While researchers around the world race to develop an effective and safe COVID-19 vaccine, a team from the San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC) at UC San Diego contributed to a study led by Vanderbilt Vaccine Center of Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) on T cell receptors, which play a vital role in alerting the adaptive immune system to mount an attack on invading foreign pathogens including the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

IAVI [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.iavi.org/newsroom
FEATURES
October 8, 2020
What are monoclonal antibodies, and can they treat COVID-19?
Monoclonal antibodies have changed the way we treat many diseases. They are a promising treatment for COVID-19, and IAVI is committed to developing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that will be globally accessible. 

International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities [ICMRA]
http://www.icmra.info/drupal/en/news
Selected Statements, Press Releases, Research
No new digest content identified.

International Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association [IGBA]
https://www.igbamedicines.org/
News
No new digest content identified.

IFFIm
http://www.iffim.org/
Announcements
No new digest content identified.

IFRC [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/news/press-releases/
Selected Press Releases, Announcements
Global
World Mental Health Day: New Red Cross survey shows COVID-19 affecting mental health of one in two people
Geneva, 8 October (ICRC/IFRC) – Half of all respondents – 51 percent – in a seven-country survey said that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected their mental health, an International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) survey found. In a new repo …
8 October 2020

IRC International Rescue Committee [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.rescue.org/press-release-index
Media highlights [Selected]
Press Release
New IRC data: Nearly 500 children sent to Libyan detention centres in past 6 months; IRC calls for immediate closure of inhumane centres
October 8, 2020

Press Release
Twelve fold increase in Ethiopia COVID-19 cases, severe weather and locusts creating massive need in Ethiopia, warns IRC
October 7, 2020

IVAC [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/ivac/index.html
Updates; Events
No new digest content identified.

IVI [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.ivi.int/
Selected IVI News, Announcements, Events
Event
Building Vaccine Diplomacy and Advocacy
IVI Virtual State Forum 2020
Tuesday, October 13, 2020
04:00 New York / 10:00 Geneva, Copenhagen, Oslo / 17:00 Seoul
Watch live: bit.ly/ivi-state-forum-2020
Registration Required

JEE Alliance [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.jeealliance.org/
Selected News and Events
No new digest content identified.

MSF/Médecins Sans Frontières [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.msf.org/
Latest [Selected Announcements]
Lebanon
“I needed to make myself useful to overcome the panic”
Voices from the Field 9 Oct 2020

Kenya
COVID-19 further fuels mental health crisis in Dadaab as durable soluti…
Project Update 9 Oct 2020

Greece
EU must stop trapping people in miserable conditions on the Greek isl…
Statement 8 Oct 2020

Coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic
MSF supports India and South Africa ask to waive COVID-19 patent rights
Press Release 7 Oct 2020
[See Week in Review above for detail]

Coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic
High COVID-19 rates found among people living in extreme hardship in and …
Press Release 6 Oct 2020

Refugees, IDPs and people on the move
Enough is enough: new pact, same misery for refugees
Op-Ed 5 Oct 2020

National Vaccine Program Office – U.S. HHS [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.hhs.gov/vaccines/about/index.html
No new digest content identified.

NIH [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases
Selected News Releases
NIH clinical trial testing hyperimmune intravenous immunoglobulin plus remdesivir to treat COVID-19 Begins
October 8, 2020 — The study is taking place in hospitalized adults in the United States, Mexico and 16 other countries.

NIH to launch the Serological Sciences Network for COVID-19, announce grant and contract awardees
October 8, 2020 — The initiative is aimed at quickly increasing the nation’s antibody testing capacity.

NIH RADx initiative advances six new COVID-19 testing technologies
October 6, 2020 — Addition of new, rapid point-of-care platforms will expand national testing options.

NIH to support 85 new grants featuring high-risk, high-reward research
October 6, 2020 — The 2020 Director’s Awards will feature highly innovative biomedical research by investigators at all career stages.

PATH [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.path.org/media-center/
Press Releases
No new digest content identified.

Sabin Vaccine Institute [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.sabin.org/updates/pressreleases
Statements and Press Releases
No new digest content identified.

UNAIDS [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.unaids.org/en
Selected Press Releases/Reports/Statements
7 October 2020
Lessons from the Ashodaya PrEP project in India

6 October 2020
Faith communities discuss the way forward in the HIV response

5 October 2020
Tanzanian community-based organizations support women who use drugs

5 October 2020
Women living with HIV are more likely to access HIV testing and treatment

UNICEF [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.unicef.org/media/press-releases
Statement
10/09/2020
Statement by UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore on awarding of Nobel Peace Prize to WFP

Press release
10/07/2020
One stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, according to first ever joint UN estimates
COVID-19-related health service disruptions could worsen the situation, potentially adding nearly 200,000 more stillbirths over a 12-month period

Statement
10/06/2020
UNICEF Statement on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Press release
10/06/2020
Unrelenting violence continues to impact children in Ituri, eastern DRC

Statement
10/05/2020
Teachers: Leading in crisis, reimagining the future
Joint statement from David Edwards, General Secretary, Education International, Guy Ryder, Director-General, International Labour Organization, Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO and Henrietta Fore, Executive Director, UNICEF

Press release
10/05/2020
Education Cannot Wait, the Global Partnership for Education, UNESCO & UNICEF call for the resumption of salary payments for teachers for the coming school year in Yemen

Statement
10/05/2020
Statement by Henrietta Fore, UNICEF Executive Director, to UNHCR Executive Committee
[As delivered]

Unitaid [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://unitaid.org/
Featured News
No new digest content identified.

Vaccination Acceptance Research Network (VARN) [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://vaccineacceptance.org/news.html#header1-2r
Announcements
No new digest content identified.

Vaccine Confidence Project [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.vaccineconfidence.org/
Research and Reports
No new digest content identified.

Vaccine Education Center – Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center
No new digest content identified.

Wellcome Trust [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://wellcome.ac.uk/news
Explainer | 5 October 2020
What are monoclonal antibodies – and can they treat Covid-19?
For more than 30 years, monoclonal antibodies have transformed the way we treat many diseases. Researchers think they are also one of the most promising treatments for Covid-19. Here’s why.

Explainer | 5 October 2020
How can we get effective treatments for Covid-19?
From repurposed drugs to new therapies – researchers are working at incredible speed to find the best ways to treat Covid-19 patients.

The Wistar Institute [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.wistar.org/news/press-releases
Press Releases
No new digest content identified.

WFPHA: World Federation of Public Health Associations [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.wfpha.org/
Latest News
No new digest content identified.

World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.oie.int/en/for-the-media/press-releases/2020/
Press Releases
No new digest content identified.

::::::

ARM [Alliance for Regenerative Medicine] [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://alliancerm.org/press-releases/
Press Releases
The Alliance for Regenerative Medicine Applauds the Award of the Nobel Prize to CRISPR Pioneers
October 7, 2020
Washington, DC

BIO [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://www.bio.org/press-releases
Press Releases
BIO’s Dr. McMurry-Heath Applauds FDA Release of Guidance for Covid-19 Vaccines
October 6, 2020
Dr. Michelle McMurry-Heath, the president and CEO of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), today applauded the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for publicly releasing new guidance related to the emergency use authorization of future Covid-19 vaccines…
“In the midst of a pandemic, transparency and collaboration are critical if we are going to quickly and safely eradicate this global health threat. That is why we recently called for the public release of any new FDA guidance concerning emergency use authorization for Covid-19 vaccines. The release of this information is vital for the scientists and researchers working on the frontlines combating this pandemic, as well as for building public confidence in the scientific solutions our industry is committed to delivering.
“We applaud the FDA for following their tried and true tradition of releasing their guidance in a public and transparent way. Science should stand on its own. While we are still reviewing the details, this is an important step forward in providing greater regulatory clarity for vaccine makers and in earning the American people’s trust in any future vaccines. We look forward to ongoing communication with the independent experts at the FDA to further clarify the steps needed to bring a safe and effective vaccine to the American public.”

DCVMN – Developing Country Vaccine Manufacturers Network [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.dcvmn.org/
News; Upcoming events
No new digest content identified.

ICBA – International Council of Biotechnology Associations [to 10 Oct 2020]
https://internationalbiotech.org/
News
No new digest content identified.

IFPMA [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.ifpma.org/resources/news-releases/
Selected Press Releases, Statements, Publications
IFPMA Statement for the Special session of the Executive Board on implementation of Resolution WHA73.1
06 October 2020
OVID-19 is a human, social, and economic tragedy that, as of September 2020, has cost more than a million lives globally and is estimated to contract global GDP by $US 7 trillion in 2020.

Since the early days of this pandemic, the R&D-based biopharmaceutical industry has responded through many initiatives aimed at providing and prioritizing delivery of critical products to tackle COVID-19, motivated by a strong sense of responsibility to act together, in partnership with WHO and governments, to support health systems across the world in a concerted and collective response. In this spirit, IFPMA is  proud to be a founding member of the ACT-A Accelerator.

The R&D-based biopharmaceutical industry firmly believes that a coordinated, inclusive, and multi-stakeholder action is necessary to mitigate the impact of this unprecedented global health emergency, ensuring that no one is left behind. The private sector has an essential role to play in combating this public health crisis through its expertise, innovation, and resources. In the endeavour of finding effective and safe treatments and vaccines at record speed, the private R&D business model, enabled by strong and effective intellectual property incentives, has significantly contributed to the discovery and development of treatments that are currently being tested.

IFPMA member companies are deeply aware that science and innovation are a key part of the equation but not the entire solution. We remain committed to the principle of equitable and affordable access to COVID-19-related health products and call upon governments to do their part in ensuring adequate resources are appropriately allocated to build resilient, and sustainable healthcare systems. Investing in health is critical to ensuring growth and prosperity. With COVID-19 having exposed major weaknesses in pandemic preparedness, we welcome the WHO’s decision to conduct an independent evaluation of the global COVID-19 response to identify lessons learned.

PhRMA [to 10 Oct 2020]
http://www.phrma.org/
Selected Press Releases, Statements
The latest: What they are saying: Intellectual property protections vital to incentivize ongoing COVID-19 research and development
October 7, 2020
America’s biopharmaceutical companies are committed to COVID-19 treatment and vaccine research and development (R&D). Reliable IP protections have helped drive innovation and enhance patient access to breakthrough therapies. Innovators are also relying on these strong protections to discover new medical advances that will keep patients healthy during this pandemic and after…Strong and reliable IP protections support America’s robust innovation ecosystem by promoting innovation and affordability for patients who rely on new treatments and cures, like those in development to treat COVID-19. America’s biopharmaceutical companies remain committed to ensuring that treatments and vaccines developed for COVID-19 are available to all who need them.

PhRMA Statement on U.S. Food and Drug Administration COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization Vaccine Guidelines
October 6, 2020
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America president and CEO, Stephen J. Ubl made the following statement about reporting around the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drafting new guidelines to bring about greater clarity and continued scientific rigor to the review and potential approvals of COVID-19 vaccines for emergency use authorization:
“PhRMA represents an industry built on the bedrock of scientific rigor. Back in September, leading biopharmaceutical companies researching and developing potential vaccines for COVID-19 issued a pledge ‘to make the safety and well-being of vaccinated individuals the top priority in development of the first COVID-19 vaccines.’
“This commitment to supporting a sound, scientific and deliberative process for the development and review of COVID-19 vaccines has not wavered.
“PhRMA supports any efforts by FDA to provide clarifying guidance and we have engaged with the agency to support bringing greater transparency to the review process for COVID-19 vaccines. To help address this public health crisis, our companies have also taken unprecedented steps to share vaccine clinical trial protocols and data in real time. We welcome the agency’s efforts to instill confidence in the rigorous safety of these potential vaccines.
“Science is guiding every aspect of our work. We remain focused on ensuring the highest of standards of patient safety, research, clinical testing and manufacturing are upheld throughout the vaccine research and development process.”

Journal Watch
Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review continues its weekly scanning of key peer-reviewed journals to identify and cite articles, commentary and editorials, books reviews and other content supporting our focu-s on vaccine ethics and policy. Journal Watch is not intended to be exhaustive, but indicative of themes and issues the Center is actively tracking. We selectively provide full text of some editorial and comment articles that are specifically relevant to our work. Successful access to some of the links provided may require subscription or other access arrangement unique to the publisher.
If you would like to suggest other journal titles to include in this service, please contact David Curry at: david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org

Annals of Internal Medicine
6 October 2020 Volume 173, Issue 7
http://annals.org/aim/issue

Medicine and Public Issues
Institutional Review Board Quality, Private Equity, and Promoting Ethical Human Subjects Research
Holly Fernandez Lynch, JD, MBE and Stephen Rosenfeld, MD, MBA
Several U.S. senators have raised concerns about the growing trends of private equity ownership and consolidation of for-profit institutional review boards (IRBs). This article summarizes the challenges in assessing IRB quality, explores the pros and cons of the for-profit and nonprofit IRB models, and presents a new model of IRB oversight.

BMC Medical Ethics
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedethics/content
(Accessed 10 Oct 2020)

Debate
Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actors
Authors: Beverley A. Townsend
6 October 2020

BMC Public Health
http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles
(Accessed 10 Oct 2020)

Exploring attitudes of adolescents and caregivers towards community-based delivery of the HPV vaccine: a qualitative study
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among adolescents is an important strategy to prevent cervical and other cancers in adulthood. However, uptake remains far below the Healthy People 2020 targets for the U…
Authors: Shoba Ramanadhan, Constance Fontanet, Marina Teixeira, Sitara Mahtani and Ingrid Katz
Citation: BMC Public Health 2020 20:1531
Content type: Research article
Published on: 9 October 2020

Health Research Policy and Systems
http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content
[Accessed 10 Oct 2020]

Content type: Research
Strengthening National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups in resource-limited settings: current and potential linkages with polio national certification committees
Authors: Sharon A. Greene, Blanche-Philomene Melanga Anya, Humayun Asghar, Irtaza A. Chaudhri, S. Deblina Datta, Morgane E. Donadel, Koffi Isidore Kouadio, Abigail M. Shefer and Kathleen F. Cavallaro
6 October 2020
Countries are transitioning assets and functions from polio eradication to integrated immunization and surveillance activities. We assessed the extent of linkages between and perceptions of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) and National Certification Committees (NCCs) for polio eradication to understand how linkages can be leveraged to improve efficiencies of these expert bodies.

Humanitarian Exchange Magazine
Number 78, October 2020
https://odihpn.org/magazine/inclusion-of-persons-with-disabilities-in-humanitarian-action-what-now/

Disability inclusion in humanitarian action
by HPN October 2020
The theme of this edition of Humanitarian Exchange, co-edited with Sherin Alsheikh Ahmed from Islamic Relief Worldwide, is disability inclusion in humanitarian action. Persons with disabilities are not only disproportionately impacted by conflicts, disasters and other emergencies, but also face barriers to accessing humanitarian assistance. At the same time, global commitments and standards and the IASC Guidelines on the inclusion of persons with disabilities in humanitarian action all emphasise how persons with disabilities are also active agents of change. Disability and age-focused organisations have led on testing and demonstrating how inclusion can be done better. Yet despite this progress, challenges to effective inclusion remain.

As Kirstin Lange notes in the lead article, chief among these challenges is humanitarian agencies’ lack of engagement with organisations of persons with disabilities. Simione Bula, Elizabeth Morgan and Teresa Thomson look at disability inclusion in humanitarian response in the Pacific, and Kathy Al Jubeh and Alradi Abdalla argue for a ‘participation revolution’, building on learning from the gender movement. Tchaurea Fleury and Sulayman AbdulMumuni Ujah outline how the Bridge Article 11 training initiative is encouraging constructive exchange between humanitarian and disability actors. The lack of good, disaggregated data is highlighted by Sarah Collinson; Frances Hill, Jim Cranshaw and Carys Hughes emphasise the need for training resources in local languages and accessible formats; and Sophie Van Eetvelt and colleagues report on a review of the evidence on inclusion of people with disabilities and older people.

Rebecca Molyneux and co-authors analyse the findings of a review of a DFID programme in north-east Nigeria, while Carolin Funke highlights the importance of strategic partnerships between disability-focused organisations, drawing on her research in Cox’s Bazar. Sherin Alsheikh Ahmed describes Islamic Relief Worldwide’s approach to mainstreaming protection and inclusion, while Pauline Thivillier and Valentina Shafina outline IRC’s Client Responsive Programming. The edition ends with reflections by Mirela Turcanu and Yves Ngunzi Kahashi on CAFOD’s SADI approach.

Infectious Diseases of Poverty
http://www.idpjournal.com/content
[Accessed 10 Oct 2020]

Towards integrated surveillance-response systems for the prevention of future pandemics
Authors: Jakob Zinsstag, Jürg Utzinger, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Lv Shan and Xiao-Nong Zhou
Content type: Opinion
7 October 2020

JAMA
October 6, 2020, Vol 324, No. 13, Pages 1261-1362
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/currentissue

Viewpoint
COVID-19 and the Path to Immunity
David S. Stephens, MD; M. Juliana McElrath, MD, PhD
free access has active quiz
JAMA. 2020;324(13):1279-1281. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.16656
This Viewpoint reviews what is known about acute and long-term B-cell, antibody, and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and explains how each are implicated in vaccine candidates likely to be effective and durably protective again COVID-19.

JAMA
October 6, 2020, Vol 324, No. 13, Pages 1261-1362
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/currentissue

Viewpoint
Emergency Use Authorizations During the COVID-19 PandemicLessons From Hydroxychloroquine for Vaccine Authorization and Approval
Kyle Thomson, JD, MPH; Herschel Nachlis, PhD
free access has active quiz has multimedia has audio
JAMA. 2020;324(13):1282-1283. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.16253
This Viewpoint uses the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 treatment to emphasize the costs of premature regulatory authorizations to public health and trust, and proposes the use of advisory committees, requirements for postmarketing surveillance, and adherence to standards of transparency for any future EUAs.

JAMA
October 6, 2020, Vol 324, No. 13, Pages 1261-1362
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/currentissue

Viewpoint
Regulatory Decision-making on COVID-19 Vaccines During a Public Health Emergency
Jerry Avorn, MD; Aaron Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH
free access has active quiz has multimedia has audio
JAMA. 2020;324(13):1284-1285. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.17101
This Viewpoint reviews the enormous political and public pressures the FDA is likely to be under in fall 2020 to provide emergency authorization or approval of candidate COVID-19 vaccines, and urges adherence to existing science-based protocols for approval to ensure vaccine safety and acceptance and thus protect the public’s health.

JAMA
October 6, 2020, Vol 324, No. 13, Pages 1261-1362
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/currentissue

Editorial
Reassuring the Public and Clinical Community About the Scientific Review and Approval of a COVID-19 Vaccine
Howard Bauchner, MD; Preeti N. Malani, MD, MSJ; Joshua Sharfstein, MD
Public perception of the review of medications and vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become enmeshed in politics. The pressure on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD, to approve the broad use of a COVID-19 vaccine in the coming months will be immense. However, a lack of clarity about the agency’s approach—coupled with a stream of announcements from various federal agencies and pharmaceutical companies—has led to confusion and concern. Greater clarity and transparency about the review process as well as the full engagement of the relevant federal advisory committees can inspire understanding and trust.

A flurry of recent statements has captured headlines. Commissioner Hahn indicated that the FDA is willing to use an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines before phase 3 trials are complete.¹ An EUA provides a rapid approach to facilitate availability and use of biologics, drugs, vaccines, devices, and diagnostic tests (referred to as “medical countermeasures”) during a public health emergency.² Some medical experts have suggested that this approach is inappropriate. On August 27, 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) instructed states to begin to prepare for distribution of a vaccine in the coming months.³ On September 3, the chief executive officer (CEO) of Pfizer announced that the company will have sufficient data to know if its vaccine is effective by the end of October and will consider filing for EUA.^4,5 But on September 4, the White House chief advisor for the coronavirus vaccine development program, Operation Warp Speed, announced that it was “extremely unlikely but not impossible” that a vaccine could be available by the end of October.⁶

On September 8 the CEOs of 9 pharmaceutical companies released a joint pledge that they are committed to “developing and testing potential vaccines for COVID-19 in accordance with high ethical standards and sound scientific principles.”⁷ The pledge indicates that they would “only submit for approval or emergency use authorization after demonstrating safety and efficacy through a Phase 3 clinical study that is designed and conducted to meet requirements of expert regulatory authorities such as FDA.” The statement does not include any commitment or suggestion that the data underpinning their application be shared with any other group.⁸ These announcements have left some clinicians, public health officials, and members of the public bewildered about what is actually happening and concerned that vaccines will be made available before safety and effectiveness are fully established.

The goal of making available a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine is widely seen as critical for ending the pandemic, and Operation Warp Speed has accelerated the development, testing, and eventual distribution of such a vaccine. However, recent polls of adults suggest that as few as 50% of US adults are committed to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine,⁹ and misinformation and conspiracy theories about a vaccine abound. Prematurely approving a vaccine could undermine COVID-19 vaccination efforts and erode confidence in vaccines more generally.

The path forward starts with support, not mistrust, of the career FDA scientists and officials with the expertise to determine whether emerging vaccine candidates are ready for use in specific populations. The director of the FDA center responsible for vaccine review, Peter Marks, MD, told the Washington Post that the COVID-19 vaccine will only be authorized or licensed when it meets the existing guidelines for safety and efficacy.¹⁰ This statement of agency policy is reassuring. Rather than prejudging any decision, and consistent with the scientific method, FDA staff should have the ability to evaluate the data from phase 3 trials and make the case for whether those trials establish safety and effectiveness. The staff scientists should then be able to recommend either an EUA or full licensure to provide access to a safe and effective vaccine as quickly as possible. If the recommendation is for an EUA, the staff scientists should explain why this path was taken and how this would not mean compromising on the answers to critical questions.

Beyond internal deliberations within the FDA, a thorough and transparent review process of data supporting vaccine approval is essential to building public confidence in a COVID-19 vaccine.

Important safeguards should be established to reassure the clinical community and the public about any vaccine approval. The FDA should explain the role of the data and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) for the vaccine trials, the first “independent” group that reviews the data, and any correspondence between the DSMB and the project investigators should be shared with the public. Two additional groups have an important consultant responsibility to the government and the public: the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee^11,12 and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).¹³ These advisory groups are composed of medical, scientific, health policy, and public health experts who review data and develop recommendations for the use of vaccines.

The FDA should share all allowable and available data about a vaccine candidate with the FDA vaccine advisory committee and ACIP prior to making any decision about an EUA or approval. Typically, the FDA’s vaccine committee makes recommendations prior to agency action, and ACIP soon afterward. In this challenging situation, the FDA should seek the input of both committees prior to making a decision. An FDA decision consistent with the advice of these independent experts will then reassure the public. However, if the FDA goes in a different direction, the agency will need to explain the reasons well to avoid confusion and vaccine hesitancy. If either panel is excluded from reviewing data, the FDA may struggle to convince the public and clinical community about the strength of the evidence, and vaccine uptake may be adversely affected.

Some have expressed concern that political appointees in the executive branch may insist on an EUA for a vaccine over the recommendation of FDA career scientists. Such interference would both present a direct risk to the US public and cause incalculable damage to public trust in the federal government’s ability to make critical scientific decisions. The FDA should be clear at the time of the announcement of an EUA or approval of a vaccine if such an EUA or approval had been mandated by members of the executive branch against the advice of the agency scientists. In such a scenario, Congress should take action to protect the public.

A more nuanced issue is the potential effect of an EUA or approval on ongoing research. The agency should work with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop a joint approach to support ongoing vaccine trials, including further research on the vaccines in question. It would be unfortunate for the FDA and NIH to present conflicting views of a vaccine, as happened with convalescent plasma for treatment of severe COVID-19.

This is a time of great societal upheaval, and the response to the pandemic has required difficult decisions. An effective COVID-19 vaccine, if widely available and with substantial uptake, will allow society over time to return to some semblance of normalcy. The FDA remains the agency to answer the core question of when vaccines are safe and effective for the US population. It also remains essential for the FDA to be fully informed by independent scientific experts, to promote trust and confidence on the path to ending the pandemic.

JAMA
October 6, 2020, Vol 324, No. 13, Pages 1261-1362
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/currentissue

Clinical Update
Vaccine Refusal and Measles Outbreaks in the US
Varun K. Phadke, MD; Robert A. Bednarczyk, MS, PhD; Saad B. Omer, MBBS, MPH, PhD
has audio
JAMA. 2020;324(13):1344-1345. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.14828
This JAMA Insights feature provides a narrative update of a 2016 systematic review documenting an association between vaccine refusal and measles epidemiology in the US, and reaffirms based on the new evidence that vaccine refusal remains a significant contributor to measles resurgence in the postelimination era.

JAMA Network
COVID-19 Update October 10, 2020

These articles on COVID-19 were published across the JAMA Network in the last week.

JAMA Pediatrics
October 2020, Vol 174, No. 10, Pages 919-1012
http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/issue.aspx

Viewpoint
School Closure During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) PandemicAn Effective Intervention at the Global Level?
Susanna Esposito, MD; Nicola Principi, MD
free access has active quiz
JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(10):921-922. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1892
This Viewpoint discusses the effectiveness of school closure as a preventive measure during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

JAMA Pediatrics
October 2020, Vol 174, No. 10, Pages 919-1012
http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/issue.aspx

Impact of Policy on Children
Study Designs and Statistical Methods for Studies of Child and Adolescent Health Policies
Benjamin French, PhD; Elizabeth A. Stuart, PhD
JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(10):925-927. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3408
This Viewpoint discusses selection of data and statistical methods that can be used to estimate policy effects using that data.
Rigorous empirical studies of the effect of a policy intervention seek to consider (or estimate) what outcomes are (or would be) with the policy compared with what outcomes are (or would be) without the policy. For example, consider whether decriminalization of adult marijuana use (medical or recreational) is associated with adolescent marijuana use.¹ As detailed below, one can use data over time from states that did and did not decriminalize adult marijuana use and compare observed trends in adolescent marijuana use among states with the policy change to expected (or predicted) trends in marijuana use, had the policy change not occurred, to estimate the policy effect. Of note, the policy effect could also be estimated in settings in which there is not a comparison group, such as if marijuana were decriminalized nationwide. We focus on settings often referred to as group panel data, for which there are aggregate data available on groups of interest with outcomes measured over time both before and after the policy change and ideally with comparison groups that did not experience a policy change; individual-level data could also be available within the groups. The data in some cases correspond with full population data at each time point; in others, there might be repeated cross-sections of data, such as annual surveys of marijuana use among 10th graders. As long as the data can be thought of as representative of the unit under study, either data structure can be appropriate. We broadly consider the selection of data to examine (eg, the units to study, the time period to examine) as well as the statistical methods that can be used to estimate policy effects using that data.

JAMA Pediatrics
October 2020, Vol 174, No. 10, Pages 919-1012
http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/issue.aspx

Review
Gene and Stem Cell Therapies for Fetal Care – A Review
Amy E. O’Connell, MD, PhD; Stephanie Guseh, MD; Larissa Lapteva, MD, MHS, MBA; et al.
JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(10):985-991. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1519
Abstract
Importance  Gene and stem cell therapies have become viable therapeutic options for many postnatal disorders. For select conditions, prenatal application would provide improved outcomes. The fetal state allows for several theoretical advantages over postnatal therapy, including immune immaturity and cellular niche accessibility.
Observations  Advances in prenatal diagnostic accuracy and surgical precision, as well as improvements in stem cell and gene therapy methods, have made prenatal gene and stem cell therapy realistic. Studies in mouse models and early human trials demonstrate the feasibility of these approaches. Additional efforts are under way to streamline fetal applications of stem cell and gene therapy while carefully considering best ethical practice and following established regulatory pathways.
Conclusions and Relevance  Fetal stem cell and gene therapy bring important therapeutic opportunities for select disorders that present in the fetal and neonatal periods. While this field is in its infancy, these therapies are starting to be available clinically, and clinicians should be aware of their benefits and challenges.

Journal of Development Economics
Volume 147 November 2020
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-development-economics/vol/147/suppl/C

Research article Open access
Managing the spread of disease with mobile phone data
Sveta Milusheva
Article 102559
Abstract
While human mobility has important benefits for economic growth, it can generate negative externalities. This paper studies the effect of mobility on the spread of disease in a low-incidence setting when people do not internalize their risks to others. Using malaria as a case study and 15 billion mobile phone records across nine million SIM cards, this paper quantifies the relationship between travel and the spread of disease. The estimates indicate that an infected traveler contributes to 1.66 additional cases reported in the health facility at the traveler’s destination. This paper develops a simulation-based policy tool that uses mobile phone data to inform strategic targeting of travelers based on their origins and destinations. The simulations suggest that targeting informed by mobile phone data could reduce the caseload by 50 percent more than current strategies that rely only on previous incidence.

The Lancet
Oct 10, 2020 Volume 396 Number 10257 p1045-1128
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/issue/current

Commission Statement
Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement on the occasion of the 75th session of the UN General Assembly
The Lancet COVID-19 Commissioners, Task Force Chairs, and Commission Secretariat
[See COVID-19 above for detail]

Nature
Volume 586 Issue 7828, 8 October 2020
http://www.nature.com/nature/current_issue.html

Editorial | 06 October 2020
Why Nature needs to cover politics now more than ever
Science and politics are inseparable — and Nature will be publishing more politics news, comment and primary research in the coming weeks and months.
[Editor’s text bolding in red]

Since Nature’s earliest issues, we have been publishing news, commentary and primary research on science and politics. But why does a journal of science need to cover politics? It’s an important question that readers often ask.

This week, Nature reporters outline what the impact on science might be if Joe Biden wins the US presidential election on 3 November, and chronicle President Donald Trump’s troubled legacy for science. We plan to increase politics coverage from around the world, and to publish more primary research in political science and related fields.

Science and politics have always depended on each other. The decisions and actions of politicians affect research funding and research-policy priorities. At the same time, science and research inform and shape a spectrum of public policies, from environmental protection to data ethics. The actions of politicians affect the higher-education environment, too. They can ensure that academic freedom is upheld, and commit institutions to work harder to protect equality, diversity and inclusion, and to give more space to voices from previously marginalized communities. However, politicians also have the power to pass laws that do the opposite.

The coronavirus pandemic, which has taken more than one million lives so far, has propelled the science–politics relationship into the public arena as never before, and highlighted some serious problems. COVID-related research is being produced at a rate unprecedented for an infectious disease, and there is, rightly, intense worldwide interest in how political leaders are using science to guide their decisions — and how some are misunderstanding, misusing or suppressing it. And there is much interest in the fluctuating relationship between politicians and the scientists who governments consult or employ.

Scholarly autonomy under threat

Perhaps even more troubling are signs that politicians are pushing back against the principle of protecting scholarly autonomy, or academic freedom. This principle, which has existed for centuries — including in previous civilizations — sits at the heart of modern science.

Today, this principle is taken to mean that researchers who access public funding for their work can expect no — or very limited — interference from politicians in the conduct of their science, or in the eventual conclusions at which they arrive. And that, when politicians and officials seek advice or information from researchers, it is on the understanding that they do not get to dictate the answers. This is the basis for today’s covenant between science and politics, and it applies across a range of research, education, public-policy and regulatory domains.

It is not a perfect system by any means. Some research areas are more autonomous than others, and autonomy can never be a blank cheque: researchers must also be held accountable for their actions, and standards of quality and integrity must be upheld. But protection for autonomy is a long-standing benchmark, the standard to which experts and policymakers aspire. It requires a degree of trust between researcher and politician that each will keep to their word. And when this trust starts to ebb away, the system, too, begins to look vulnerable.

That trust is now under considerable pressure around the world. Cracks have been evident for years in the field of climate change, with a number of politicians ignoring or seeking to undermine the irrefutable evidence showing that humans are the cause. But this lack of trust can now also be seen in other public domains in which verifiable knowledge and research are needed for effective policy-making.

Last year, Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro sacked the head of the country’s National Institute for Space Research because the president refused to accept the agency’s reports that deforestation in the Amazon has accelerated during his tenure. In the same year, more than 100 economists wrote to India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, urging an end to political influence over official statistics — especially economic data — in the country.

And just last week, in Japan, incoming Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga rejected the nomination of six academics, who have previously been critical of government science policy, to the Science Council of Japan. This is an independent organization meant to represent the voice of Japanese scientists. It is the first time that this has happened since prime ministers started approving nominations in 2004.

The pandemic, too, is uncovering examples of political interference in science. In June in the United Kingdom, the statistics regulator wrote to the government, highlighting repeated inaccuracies in its COVID-19 testing data, which the regulator says seem to be aimed at showing “the largest possible number of tests”.

The fields of public-health and infectious-disease research have revealed much about the effects of pandemics and how to curb them. This year, a large volume of work on COVID-19 has illuminated the behaviour of both the virus and the disease. Research has also revealed uncertainties, gaps and errors in our knowledge, as would be expected. But that doesn’t excuse the behaviour we are seeing from politicians around the world, exemplified by Trump’s notorious actions: a chaotic, often ill-informed response, with scientists being attacked and undermined.

The principle that the state will respect scholarly independence is one of the foundations underpinning modern research, and its erosion carries grave risks for standards of quality and integrity in research and policymaking. When politicians break that covenant, they endanger the health of people, the environment and societies.

This is why Nature’s news correspondents will redouble their efforts to watch and report on what is happening in politics and research worldwide. It is why authors of our expert commentaries will continue to assess and critique developments; and why the journal is looking to publish more primary research in political science.

And, in these editorial pages, we will continue to urge politicians to embrace the spirit of learning and collaboration, to value different perspectives, and to honour their commitment to scientific and scholarly autonomy.

The conventions that have guided the relationship between science and politics are under threat, and Nature cannot stand by in silence.

Nature Biotechnology
Volume 38 Issue 10, October 2020
https://www.nature.com/nbt/volumes/38/issues/10

SARS-CoV-2 detection
In this issue, several groups report their findings on the development of methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in patients and in the community, and benchmark assays to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.

The conventions that have guided the relationship between science and politics are under threat, and Nature cannot stand by in silence.

Comment | 06 October 2020
COVID-19 vaccines: how to ensure Africa has access
History must not repeat itself — global and continental cooperation are essential.
John N. Nkengasong, Nicaise Ndembi[…] & Tajudeen Raji

Nature Biotechnology
Volume 38 Issue 10, October 2020
https://www.nature.com/nbt/volumes/38/issues/10

Editorial | 24 September 2020
Trumping science
The scientific integrity of US government agencies is under attack from the Trump administration. Agency senior executives and industry leaders need to continue pushing back.

Nature Biotechnology
Volume 38 Issue 10, October 2020
https://www.nature.com/nbt/volumes/38/issues/10

Comment | 14 September 2020
Artificial intelligence, drug repurposing and peer review
Can traditional computational analysis and machine learning help compensate for inadequate peer review of drug-repurposing papers in the context of an infodemic?
Jeremy M. Levin, Tudor I. Oprea[…] & Alex Zhavoronkov

Nature Biotechnology
Volume 38 Issue 10, October 2020
https://www.nature.com/nbt/volumes/38/issues/10

Q&A | 28 September 2020
Whither COVID-19 vaccines?
Nature Biotechnology convenes a group of experts to provide their insights into SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development.
Laura DeFrancesco

Nature Biotechnology
Volume 38 Issue 10, October 2020
https://www.nature.com/nbt/volumes/38/issues/10

Patents | 05 October 2020
Pledging intellectual property for COVID-19
Voluntary pledges to make intellectual property broadly available to address urgent public health crises can overcome administrative and legal hurdles faced by more elaborate legal arrangements such as patent pools and achieve greater acceptance than governmental compulsory licensing.
Jorge L. Contreras, Michael Eisen[…] & Frank Tietze

New England Journal of Medicine
October 8, 2020 Vol. 383 No. 15
http://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/medical-journal

Editorials
Dying in a Leadership Vacuum
The Editors
[See Featured Journal Content above for full text]

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/

Research Article
Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of universal meningitis b vaccination among college students prior to college entry
Grace S. Chung, David W. Hutton
Research Article | published 09 Oct 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239926

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/

Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
Sarah A. Nowak, Christine Chen, Andrew M. Parker, Courtney A. Gidengil, Luke J. Matthews
Research Article | published 08 Oct 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239826

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/

Improving quality and use of routine health information system data in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review
Seblewengel Lemma, Annika Janson, Lars-Åke Persson, Deepthi Wickremasinghe, Carina Källestål
Research Article | published 08 Oct 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239683

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/

Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic
Silvia Gianola, Tiago S. Jesus, Silvia Bargeri, Greta Castellini
Research Article | published 06 Oct 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240123

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/

COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10)
Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Scott Ratzan, Adam Palayew, Francesco C. Billari, Agnes Binagwaho, Spencer Kimball, Heidi J. Larson, Alessia Melegaro, Kenneth Rabin, Trenton M. White, Ayman El-Mohandes
Research Article | published 06 Oct 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240011

PLoS Pathogens
http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/
[Accessed 10 Oct 2020]

Review
Preparedness needs research: How fundamental science and international collaboration accelerated the response to COVID-19
Cormac M. Kinsella, Pauline Dianne Santos, Ignacio Postigo-Hidalgo, Alba Folgueiras-González, Tim Casper Passchier, Kevin P. Szillat, Joyce Odeke Akello, Beatriz Álvarez-Rodríguez, Joan Martí-Carreras
| published 09 Oct 2020 PLOS Pathogens
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008902
Abstract
The first cluster of patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was identified on December 21, 2019, and as of July 29, 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections have been linked with 664,333 deaths and number at least 16,932,996 worldwide. Unprecedented in global societal impact, the COVID-19 pandemic has tested local, national, and international preparedness for viral outbreaks to the limits. Just as it will be vital to identify missed opportunities and improve contingency planning for future outbreaks, we must also highlight key successes and build on them. Concomitant to the emergence of a novel viral disease, there is a ‘research and development gap’ that poses a threat to the overall pace and quality of outbreak response during its most crucial early phase. Here, we outline key components of an adequate research response to novel viral outbreaks using the example of SARS-CoV-2. We highlight the exceptional recent progress made in fundamental science, resulting in the fastest scientific response to a major infectious disease outbreak or pandemic. We underline the vital role of the international research community, from the implementation of diagnostics and contact tracing procedures to the collective search for vaccines and antiviral therapies, sustained by unique information sharing efforts.

Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health (RPSP/PAJPH)
https://www.paho.org/journal/en

6 Oct 2020
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in an asymptomatic population in Sergipe, Brazil
Original research | English |
Rojas-Cortés
Abstract
Objective.
To assess all the incidents of substandard, falsified and unregistered medicines in 2017 and 2018 in Latin America, determining the types of products affected, stages of the supply chain in which incidents were detected, quality deviations identified in tested samples, and regulatory measures taken by authorities.
Methods.
A comprehensive search of the websites of the Latin American national regulatory authorities was conducted, identifying all eligible incidents during 2017-2018. Standardized values were collected from each incident for pre-determined variables: country, year, type of incident, therapeutic group, supply chain, regulatory measures and laboratory data.
Results.
A total of 596 incidents in 13 countries were included (236 substandard, 239 falsified, 116 unregistered and 5 stolen). The therapeutic categories with the highest incidents were: anti-infectives, medicines for pain/palliative care, hormones/contraceptives, medicines for the respiratory tract, and medicines for mental/behavioural disorders. The most common places where incidents were detected were commercial establishments, pharmacies, health services and manufacturers. The most recurrent quality deviations were failure in parameters (appearance or physicochemical), incorrect labelling, different quantity of active pharmaceutical ingredient, presence of unknown particles, and microbiological contamination. The most frequent regulatory measures identified were alerts, withdrawals, seizures, and prohibition of marketing/distribution/use.
Conclusions.
In Latin America, substandard, falsified and unregistered medicines persist as a highly prevalent problem. An advanced degree of regulatory development in countries is associated with higher incident detection/reporting rates and a more comprehensive set of measures. The pharmaceutical supply chain is more vulnerable in its final node. Quality deviations identified in tested samples pose serious risks to public health.

Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health (RPSP/PAJPH)
https://www.paho.org/journal/en

6 Oct 2020
Financing of integrated health service networks
Opinion and analysis | Spanish |

Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health (RPSP/PAJPH)
https://www.paho.org/journal/en

Latest articles
6 Oct 2020
Substandard, falsified and unregistered medicines in Latin America, 2017-2018
Original research | English |

Science
09 October 2020 Vol 370, Issue 6513
http://www.sciencemag.org/current.dtl

In Depth
A call to test new vaccines head to head, in monkeys
By Jon Cohen
Science09 Oct 2020 : 154-155
Proposed comparison study could clarify safety and which vaccines work best.
Summary
Primate researchers in the United States have banded together in a push for an ambitious monkey study that would do head-to-head comparisons of the leading COVID-19 vaccine candidates. Although 10 candidates are already undergoing large-scale tests in people, proponents of the monkey plan say those clinical trials may not deliver the comprehensive data needed to choose the safest and most effective vaccines. The comparison trial in monkeys, in contrast, could shed light in a matter of weeks on how the candidates stack up on measures including potential side effects, the strength of immune responses they trigger, and how well they protect against infection and disease.

Science
09 October 2020 Vol 370, Issue 6513
http://www.sciencemag.org/current.dtl

Feature
Sweden’s gamble
By Gretchen Vogel
Science09 Oct 2020 : 159-163
The country’s pandemic policies came at a high price—and created painful rifts in its scientific community.
Summary
Sweden’s government is known for keeping schools and stores open despite the COVID-19 pandemic. But there are other striking differences in the country’s approach: Authorities actively discourage people from wearing face masks, and there has been very limited testing or contact tracing. Within Sweden’s scientific and medical community, a debate about the strategy has simmered and frequently boiled over. A group of scientists known as “the 22” has called for tougher measures since April, when it published a blistering critique of the country’s public health authority. The group, which has grown to include 50 scientists, now calls itself the Vetenskapsforum COVID-19 (Science Forum COVID-19). It says the price for Sweden’s laissez-faire approach has been too high. (The country’s cumulative COVID-19 death rate so far rivals that of the United States.) And although infections waned over the summer, cases are rising again. But the group’s criticism has not been welcomed. Some critics have been publicly reprimanded, and some have decided to leave the country.

Science Translational Medicine
07 October 2020 Vol 12, Issue 564
https://stm.sciencemag.org/

Research Articles
Potential impact of tuberculosis vaccines in China, South Africa, and India
By Rebecca C. Harris, Tom Sumner, Gwenan M. Knight, Hui Zhang, Richard G. White
Science Translational Medicine07 Oct 2020
Tuberculosis vaccines should aim to protect infected populations against disease, but other vaccine types may be of use in high-transmission settings.
Inferring TB vaccine impact
There are multiple tuberculosis vaccines in development, although which vaccines are the best candidates to move forward is a matter of debate. Harris et al. used transmission models calibrated to age-specific demographic and epidemiological data from China, South Africa, and India to investigate the potential long-term impact of tuberculosis vaccines with different features, including results from recent clinical trials. They estimated that vaccines preventing disease, rather than infection per se, would have the greatest impact in these countries with high tuberculosis burdens. Their findings may aid prioritization and future trial planning of tuberculosis vaccines currently in development.
Abstract
More effective tuberculosis vaccines are needed to help reach World Health Organization tuberculosis elimination goals. Insufficient evidence exists on the potential impact of future tuberculosis vaccines with varying characteristics and in different epidemiological settings. To inform vaccine development decision making, we modeled the impact of hypothetical tuberculosis vaccines in three high-burden countries. We calibrated Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) transmission models to age-stratified demographic and epidemiological data from China, South Africa, and India. We varied vaccine efficacy to prevent infection or disease, effective in persons M.tb uninfected or infected, and duration of protection. We modeled routine early-adolescent vaccination and 10-yearly mass campaigns from 2025. We estimated median percentage population-level tuberculosis incidence rate reduction (IRR) in 2050 compared to a no new vaccine scenario. In all settings, results suggested vaccines preventing disease in M.tb-infected populations would have greatest impact by 2050 (10-year, 70% efficacy against disease, IRR 51%, 52%, and 54% in China, South Africa, and India, respectively). Vaccines preventing reinfection delivered lower potential impact (IRR 1, 12, and 17%). Intermediate impact was predicted for vaccines effective only in uninfected populations, if preventing infection (IRR 21, 37, and 50%) or disease (IRR 19, 36, and 51%), with greater impact in higher-transmission settings. Tuberculosis vaccines have the potential to deliver substantial population-level impact. For prioritizing impact by 2050, vaccine development should focus on preventing disease in M.tb-infected populations. Preventing infection or disease in uninfected populations may be useful in higher transmission settings. As vaccine impact depended on epidemiology, different development strategies may be required.

Social Science & Medicine
Volume 262 October 2020
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/social-science-and-medicine/vol/262/suppl/C

Research article Abstract only
Roles of attitudes and injunctive norms in decisional conflict and disclosure following receipt of genome sequencing results
Individuals who choose to obtain genetic information may learn that their genetic profile confers health risks to themselves or offspring. Individuals may react more negatively to this information when personal attitudes, perceived norms, and/or the decision to receive results conflict with one another.
Allecia E. Reid, Rebecca A. Ferrer, Sanjana Kadirvel, Barbara B. Biesecker, … William M.P. Klein
Article 113147

Systematic Reviews
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles
[Accessed 10 Oct 2020]

A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency
We aimed to synthesise data on issues related to stakeholder perceptions of privacy, trust, and transparency in use of secondary data. A systematic literature review of healthcare consumer attitudes towards th…
Authors: Elizabeth Hutchings, Max Loomes, Phyllis Butow and Frances M. Boyle
Citation: Systematic Reviews 2020 9:235
Content type: Research
Published on: 9 October 2020

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Discussion No access
An optimal typhoid conjugate vaccine coverage complemented with WASH is imperative for the control of antimicrobial resistance in Pakistan
M. Imran Khan, Saher Aijaz, Farzeen Fatma Syed, Linda Kaljee
Pages 6969-6970

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Discussion Open access
Integrating public health programs and research after the malaria vaccine implementation program (MVIP): Recommendations for next steps
Rieke van der Graaf, Ruth Macklin, Annette Rid, Anant Bhan, … Johannes J.M. van Delden
Pages 6975-6978
Highlights
:: It is prudent to apply ethical norms for research involving humans to the WHO MVIP.
:: The MVIP might not meet the requirements of informed consent, independent ethical review, and social value.
:: WHO should make the MVIP protocol publicly available.
:: Independent ethical review should be conducted and fully informed consent obtained.
:: Communities should be engaged and alterable aspects of the MVIP should be altered.
Abstract
Background
In February 2020, international controversy arose about the ethical acceptability of the WHO Malaria Vaccine Implementation Program (MVIP). Whereas some have argued that this program must be seen as research that is not in line with international ethical standards, notably regarding informed consent and local ethical review, some WHO representatives consider the MVIP as a public health implementation program that need not adhere to these standards.
Methods
We performed a case analysis in light of the 2016 CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research involving Humans.
Findings
We argue that the MVIP has a substantial research component, and that it is prudent to therefore apply ethical norms for research involving humans, such as the CIOMS guidelines. Accordingly, we agree that the ethical requirements of informed consent and independent ethical review have not been met. In addition, we are concerned that the study might not meet CIOMS’s social value requirement.
Recommendations
We urge WHO to release more details about the process that led to the MVIP program and make the MVIP protocol publicly available. The full protocol should be assessed by the relevant ethics committees, new and already enrolled parents should be informed about the uncertainties under investigation and given a real opportunity to consent or refuse (continued) participation, communities should be engaged, and aspects of MVIP that require alteration in light of ethical review should be altered, if possible. Furthermore, in order to improve good ethical practices, it is necessary to engage in international debate regarding the integration of research and public health programs. Procedurally, vaccine implementation programs that combine both prevention and research should involve the wider international ethics community and ensure participation of the target populations in setting the proper conditions for launching such programs.

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Short communication Abstract only
Parental attitudes and decisions regarding MMR vaccination during an outbreak of measles among an undervaccinated Somali community in Minnesota
Ben Christianson, Fatuma Sharif-Mohamed, Jennifer Heath, Margaret Roddy, … Cynthia Kenyon
Pages 6979-6984

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Research article Full text access
Intention to participate in a COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial and to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in France during the pandemic
Maëlle Detoc, Sébastien Bruel, Paul Frappe, Bernard Tardy, … Amandine Gagneux-Brunon
Pages 7002-7006

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Research article Abstract only
Influenza economic burden among potential target risk groups for immunization in South Africa, 2013–2015
Stefano Tempia, Jocelyn Moyes, Adam L. Cohen, Sibongile Walaza, … Cheryl Cohen
Pages 7007-7014

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Research article Abstract only
Ethnic disparities in vaccine safety attitudes and perceptions of family doctors/general practitioners
Carol H.J. Lee, Chris G. Sibley
Pages 7024-7032

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Research article Abstract only
Maternal and paternal confidence in vaccine safety: Whose attitudes are predictive of children’s vaccination?
Carol H.J. Lee, Nickola C. Overall, Chris G. Sibley
Pages 7057-7062

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Research article Abstract only
Rate of preventative vaccine use and vaccine beliefs among a commercially insured population
Karri A. Bauer, Kelly Johnson, Judith J. Stephenson, Jay Visaria, … Laura A. Puzniak
Pages 7087-7093

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Research article Abstract only
The role of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAG) in strengthening health system governance: Lessons from three middle-income countries—Argentina, Jordan, and South Africa (2017–2018)
Maria S. Panero, Najwa Khuri-Bulos, Cristián Biscayart, Pablo Bonvehí, … Shabir A. Madhi
Pages 7118-7128

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 45 Pages 6967-7182 (21 October 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/45

Research article Full text access
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic response on uptake of routine immunizations in Sindh, Pakistan: An analysis of provincial electronic immunization registry data
Subhash Chandir, Danya Arif Siddiqi, Mariam Mehmood, Hamidreza Setayesh, … Aamir Javed Khan
Pages 7146-7155