Assessment of Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy in Preventing Influenza Infection in Infants in England, 2013–2014 and 2014–2015

Journal of Infectious Diseases
Volume 221, Issue 1, 1 January 2020
https://academic.oup.com/jid/issue/221/1

 

Editor’s Choice
Assessment of Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy in Preventing Influenza Infection in Infants in England, 2013–2014 and 2014–2015
Jemma L Walker, Hongxin Zhao, Gavin Dabrera, Nick Andrews, Sarah L Thomas
J Infect Dis, Volume 221, Issue 1, 1 January 2020, Pages 16–20, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz310
We show that maternal influenza vaccination provides significant protection for infants in the first 6 months of life against influenza-related hospitalization in both the A(H1N1)pdm09– and A(H3N2)–dominated seasons.

Enhancing Immunization Rates in Two Urban Academic Primary Care Clinics: A Before and After Assessment

Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Volume 7, Issue 1 (2020)
https://digitalrepository.aurorahealthcare.org/jpcrr/

 

Quality Improvement
Enhancing Immunization Rates in Two Urban Academic Primary Care Clinics: A Before and After Assessment
Zeeshan Yacoob, Christopher Cook, Fabiana Kotovicz, Jessica J.F. Kram, Marianne Klumph, Marisa Stanley, Paul Hunter, and Dennis J. Baumgardner

Abstracts from the 1st JoPPP Conference on Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice

Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/
[Accessed 1 Feb 2020]

Abstracts from the 1st JoPPP Conference on Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Authors: Salman Mehmood, Syed Muhammad Farid Hasan, Chinara Maratovna Razzakova, Liliya Eugenevna Ziganshina, Azjargal Ganbat, Tsetsegmaa Sanjjav, Bruce Sunderland, Gantuya Dorj, Gereltuya Dorj, Satibi Satibi, M. Rifqi Rokhman, Hardika Aditama, Ika Kartini, Rini Ambarsari, Fajar Pramesti, Peng Yeow Loh…
Content type: Meeting abstracts
29 January 2020

Emerging understandings of 2019-nCoV

The Lancet
Feb 01, 2020 Volume 395Number 10221p311-388, e16-e18
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/issue/current

 

Editorial
Emerging understandings of 2019-nCoV
The Lancet
“There is an emergency in China, but it has not yet become a global health emergency…WHO is following this outbreak every minute of every day”, said Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus, Director-General of WHO, on Jan 23. A novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak is emerging, but it is not yet a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). As we went to press, more than 500 cases have been confirmed in China, as well as in Japan, South Korea, Thailand, and the US. The virus can cause a severe respiratory illness, like SARS and MERS, and human-to-human transmission has been confirmed. These characteristics are driving China’s urgent public health actions, as well as international concern. But much remains unknown. The pieces of the puzzle that is 2019-nCoV are only now beginning to come together.

Today, we publish the first clinical data from individuals confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV from Wuhan, China. Chaolin Huang and colleagues provide comprehensive findings for the first 41 laboratory-confirmed cases. 27 of these 41 cases had direct exposure to the Wuhan seafood market that is thought to be the initial site of infection from an animal source. All had viral pneumonia. The severity of illness is concerning: almost a third of patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring intensive care; six patients died; five had acute cardiac injury; and four required ventilation.

Separately, Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan and colleagues report clinical and microbiological data from a family of six people who had travelled to Wuhan and later presented with pneumonia to Shenzhen Hospital in Guangdong province. Five were identified as infected with 2019-nCoV. Notably, none had been to the Wuhan market, but two had visited a Wuhan hospital. The authors suggest these findings confirm human-to-human transmission. Together, these Articles provide an important initial picture of the clinical spectrum and transmission of this new disease.

In an accompanying Comment, Chen Wang, George Gao, and colleagues describe the early sharing of clinical data from the outbreak and emphasise the urgent need for more information about pathogenesis and viral transmission, as well as the pressing need to develop best supportive care and a vaccine. They also caution against overstating the mortality risk, as early reported case-fatality rates may be high due to bias towards detecting severe cases. As David Heymann reflects in another accompanying Comment, publication of these Articles provides peer-reviewed information urgently needed to refine the risk assessment and response, which are happening in real time.

China has quickly isolated and sequenced the virus and shared these data internationally. The lessons from the SARS epidemic—where China was insufficiently prepared to implement infection control practices—have been successfully learned. By most accounts, Chinese authorities are meeting international standards and isolating suspected cases and contacts, developing diagnostic and treatment procedures, and implementing public education campaigns. Dr Tedros has praised China for its transparency, data sharing, and quick response. Likewise, WHO has reacted fast and diligently. Despite massive attention and conjecture about the level of threat posed by 2019-nCoV, and whether WHO should declare a PHEIC, the agency’s emergency committee has not bowed to pressure to take such a decision until necessary. We commend WHO for its resilience.

There are still many gaps in our understanding. The early experiences of these patients and the response to their symptoms before cases were reported remain undocumented. The exposure and possible infection of health workers remain extremely worrying. We will not know for some time the consequences of the quarantine imposed in Wuhan on Jan 23, 2020. Chinese public health authorities are under enormous pressure to make difficult decisions with an incomplete, and rapidly changing, understanding of the epidemic. The shutdowns may seem a drastic step—whether they represent an effective control measure deserves careful investigation and much will likely depend on maintaining trust between authorities and the local population. News media that worsen fears by reporting a “killer virus“ only harm efforts to implement a succesful and safe infection control strategy.

Openness and sharing of data are paramount. There are enormous demands for rapid access to information about this new virus, the patients and communities affected, and the response. But equally crucial is the need to ensure that those data are reliable, accurate, and independently scrutinised. As for all public health emergencies, we will be making all related Lancet content fully and freely available.

The complex challenges of HIV vaccine development require renewed and expanded global commitment

The Lancet
Feb 01, 2020 Volume 395Number 10221p311-388, e16-e18
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/issue/current

 

Viewpoint
The complex challenges of HIV vaccine development require renewed and expanded global commitment
Linda-Gail Bekker, er al
Despite substantial progress in understanding and treating HIV/AIDS, existing tools have not effectively controlled the epidemic, and the potential threat of resurgence looms as the largest cohort of young people in history enters early adulthood. 1 Treatment alone will not end the epidemic. 234 The International AIDS Society – Lancet Commission 1 recommends that global treatment efforts should be complemented with stronger investments in primary prevention, including research to accelerate the development of a preventive vaccine. Indeed, even a partially effective vaccine could help to change the course of the HIV epidemic and have a substantial public health impact. 5678

High cholera vaccination coverage following emergency campaign in Haiti: Results from a cluster survey in three rural Communes in the South Department, 2017

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
http://www.plosntds.org/
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

 

High cholera vaccination coverage following emergency campaign in Haiti: Results from a cluster survey in three rural Communes in the South Department, 2017
Ashley Sharp, Alexandre Blake, Jérôme Backx, Isabella Panunzi, Robert Barrais, Fabienne Nackers, Francisco Luquero, Yves Gaston Deslouches, Sandra Cohuet
Research Article | published 31 Jan 2020 PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007967
Author summary
After Hurricane Matthew hit Southern Haiti on October 4, 2016, there was an outbreak of Cholera. The Government launched a campaign to vaccinate residents using an oral vaccine, which has been proven to protect people against the disease. MSF supported the campaign in three rural areas, offering the vaccine in local clinics and going from door to door. We didn’t know how many people were living there at the time so we couldn’t say for sure if we had vaccinated enough people. To find out how many people were vaccinated we did a survey, choosing households at random and asking them if and where they received the vaccine. This showed that on average around 90% of people were vaccinated, which is a very high proportion. We can take encouragement from this that mass vaccination campaigns like this can work well, even in rural settings. Our survey showed that about half of people got their vaccine from a clinic and the other half from door-to-door vaccinators, so it’s probably important to use both approaches. Most people heard about the campaign through members of the local community called ‘criers’. This shows how important it is to engage with the local community during a vaccination campaign.

What constitutes a neglected tropical disease?

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
http://www.plosntds.org/
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

What constitutes a neglected tropical disease?
Peter J. Hotez, Serap Aksoy, Paul J. Brindley, Shaden Kamhawi
Editorial | published 30 Jan 2020 PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008001
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) currently classifies 20 diseases and conditions as neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). However, since its inception in 2007, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases has considered an expanded list that includes additional diseases with the chronic and/or debilitating, and poverty-promoting features of NTDs. Described here is an update of our current scope, which attempts to embrace all of the NTDs, and a discussion of the status of some of the more debated medical conditions in terms of whether or not they constitute an NTD.

When money talks: Judging risk and coercion in high-paying clinical trials

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

 

When money talks: Judging risk and coercion in high-paying clinical trials
Christina Leuker, Lasare Samartzidis, Ralph Hertwig, Timothy J. Pleskac
Research Article | published 31 Jan 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227898
Abstract
Millions of volunteers take part in clinical trials every year. This is unsurprising, given that clinical trials are often much more lucrative than other types of unskilled work. When clinical trials offer very high pay, however, some people consider them repugnant. To understand why, we asked 1,428 respondents to evaluate a hypothetical medical trial for a new Ebola vaccine offering three different payment amounts. Some respondents (27%) used very high pay (£10,000) as a cue to infer the potential risks the clinical trial posed. These respondents were also concerned that offering £10,000 was coercive— simply too profitable to pass up. Both perceived risk and coercion in high-paying clinical trials shape how people evaluate these trials. This result was robust within and between respondents. The link between risk and repugnance may generalize to other markets in which parties are partially remunerated for the risk they take and contributes to a more complete understanding of why some market transactions appear repugnant.

The cost-effectiveness of using pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) versus pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), in South African adults

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

 

The cost-effectiveness of using pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) versus pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), in South African adults
Charles Feldman, Sipho K. Dlamini, Shabir A. Madhi, Susan Meiring, Anne von Gottberg, Janetta C. de Beer, Margreet de Necker, Marthinus P. Stander
Research Article | published 29 Jan 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227945

Impact of maternal dTpa vaccination on the incidence of pertussis in young infants

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

Impact of maternal dTpa vaccination on the incidence of pertussis in young infants
Frederico Friedrich, Maria Clara Valadão, Marcos Brum, Talitha Comaru, Paulo Márcio Pitrez, Marcus Herbert Jones, Leonardo A. Pinto, Marcelo C. Scotta
Research Article | published 28 Jan 2020 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228022

The unreasonable effectiveness of deep learning in artificial intelligence

PNAS – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/
[Accessed 1 Feb 2020]

The unreasonable effectiveness of deep learning in artificial intelligence
Terrence J. Sejnowski
PNAS first published January 28, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907373117
Abstract
Deep learning networks have been trained to recognize speech, caption photographs, and translate text between languages at high levels of performance. Although applications of deep learning networks to real-world problems have become ubiquitous, our understanding of why they are so effective is lacking. These empirical results should not be possible according to sample complexity in statistics and nonconvex optimization theory. However, paradoxes in the training and effectiveness of deep learning networks are being investigated and insights are being found in the geometry of high-dimensional spaces. A mathematical theory of deep learning would illuminate how they function, allow us to assess the strengths and weaknesses of different network architectures, and lead to major improvements. Deep learning has provided natural ways for humans to communicate with digital devices and is foundational for building artificial general intelligence. Deep learning was inspired by the architecture of the cerebral cortex and insights into autonomy and general intelligence may be found in other brain regions that are essential for planning and survival, but major breakthroughs will be needed to achieve these goals.

A comparison of national essential medicines lists in the Americas

Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health (RPSP/PAJPH)
https://www.paho.org/journal/en

 

Latest articles
27 Jan 2020
A comparison of national essential medicines lists in the Americas
Original research | English |
Abstract
Objectives.
To compare national essential medicines lists (NEMLs) from countries in the Region of the Americas and to identify potential opportunities for improving those lists.
Methods.
In June of 2017, NEMLs from 31 countries in the Americas were abstracted from documents included in a World Health Organization (WHO) repository. The lists from the Americas were compared to each other and to NEMLs from outside of the Americas, as well as with the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, 20th edition (“WHO Model List”) and the list of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Regional Revolving Fund for Strategic Public Health Supplies (“Strategic Fund”).
Results.
The number of differences between the NEMLs from the Americas and the WHO Model List were similar within those countries (median: 295; interquartile range (IQR): 265 to 347). The NEMLs from the Americas were generally similar to each other. While the NEMLs from the Americas coincided well with the Strategic Fund list, some medicines were not included on any of those NEMLs. All the NEMLs in the Americas included some medicines that were withdrawn due to adverse effects by a national regulatory body (median: 8 withdrawn medicines per NEML; IQR: 4 to 12).
Conclusions.
The NEMLs in the Americas were fairly similar to each other and to the WHO Model List and the Strategic Fund list. However, some areas of treatment and some specific medicines were identified that the countries should reassess when revising their NEMLs.

Mapping global variation in dengue transmission intensity

Science Translational Medicine
29 January 2020 Vol 12, Issue 528
https://stm.sciencemag.org/

 

Research Articles
Mapping global variation in dengue transmission intensity
By Lorenzo Cattarino, Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer, Natsuko Imai, Derek A. T. Cummings, Neil M. Ferguson
Science Translational Medicine29 Jan 2020 Restricted Access
A downloadable high-resolution map of global dengue transmission intensity helps predict the potential impact of control strategies.

The age of opportunity: prevalence of key risk factors among adolescents 10–19 years of age in nine communities in sub‐Saharan Africa

Tropical Medicine & International Health
Volume 25, Issue 1 Pages: i-iv, 1-141, e1-e13 January 2020
Special Issue: Adolescent Health in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Original Articles
The age of opportunity: prevalence of key risk factors among adolescents 10–19 years of age in nine communities in sub‐Saharan Africa
Yemane Berhane et al
Pages: 15-32
First Published: 07 November 2019

Strengthening our knowledge base and research capacity for improved adolescent health in sub‐Saharan Africa: a South–South–North collaboration

Tropical Medicine & International Health
Volume 25, Issue 1 Pages: i-iv, 1-141, e1-e13 January 2020
Special Issue: Adolescent Health in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Issue Edited by: Justine Nnakate Bukenya, Chelsey R. Canavan, Till Barnighausen, Wafaie W. Fawzi
Editorial
Strengthening our knowledge base and research capacity for improved adolescent health in sub‐Saharan Africa: a South–South–North collaboration
Justine Nnakate Bukenya et al
Pages: 2-4
First Published: 27 November 2019

Comparison of the implementation of human papillomavirus and hepatitis B vaccination programs in the United States: Implications for future vaccines

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Review article Abstract only
Comparison of the implementation of human papillomavirus and hepatitis B vaccination programs in the United States: Implications for future vaccines
Catherine Constable, Arthur Caplan
Pages 954-962

Using models to shape measles control and elimination strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A review of recent applications

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Research article Open access
Using models to shape measles control and elimination strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A review of recent applications
F.T. Cutts, E. Dansereau, M.J. Ferrari, M. Hanson, … A.K. Winter

Barriers to healthcare workers reporting adverse events following immunization in four regions of Ghana

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Review article Abstract only
Barriers to healthcare workers reporting adverse events following immunization in four regions of Ghana
Jane F. Gidudu, Anna Shaum, Alex Dodoo, Samuel Bosomprah, … Hilda H. Ampadu

Using classification and regression tree analysis to explore parental influenza vaccine decisions

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Review article Abstract only
Using classification and regression tree analysis to explore parental influenza vaccine decisions
Yuki Lama, Gregory R. Hancock, Vicki S. Freimuth, Amelia M. Jamison, Sandra Crouse Quinn

Decision-making about HPV vaccination in parents of boys and girls: A population-based survey in England and Wales

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Research article Open access
Decision-making about HPV vaccination in parents of boys and girls: A population-based survey in England and Wales
Jo Waller, Alice Forster, Mairead Ryan, Rebecca Richards, … Laura Marlow

Governing off-label vaccine use: An environmental scan of the Global National Immunization Technical Advisory Group Network

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Review article Abstract only
Governing off-label vaccine use: An environmental scan of the Global National Immunization Technical Advisory Group Network
Karina A. Top, Abdoulreza Esteghamati, Melissa Kervin, Louise Henaff, … Noni E. MacDonald

Financial cost analysis of a strategy to improve the quality of administrative vaccination data in Uganda

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Review article Abstract only
Financial cost analysis of a strategy to improve the quality of administrative vaccination data in Uganda
Kirsten Ward, Kevin Mugenyi, Adam MacNeil, Henry Luzze, … Sarah W. Pallas

Strengthening national teams of experts to support HPV vaccine introduction in Eastern Mediterranean countries: Lessons learnt and recommendations from an international workshop

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Review article Abstract only
Strengthening national teams of experts to support HPV vaccine introduction in Eastern Mediterranean countries: Lessons learnt and recommendations from an international workshop
Carine Dochez, Salah Al Awaidy, Ezzeddine Mohsni, Kamal Fahmy, Mohammed Bouskraoui

Children vaccination coverage surveys: Impact of multiple sources of information and multiple contact attempts

Vaccine
Volume 38, Issue 5 Pages 951-1276 (29 January 2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/38/issue/5

 

Review article Abstract only
Children vaccination coverage surveys: Impact of multiple sources of information and multiple contact attempts
Marilou Kiely, Nicole Boulianne, Denis Talbot, Manale Ouakki, … Gaston De Serres

Assessment of the Clinical and Economic Impact of Different Immunization Protocols of Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella in Internationally Adopted Children

Vaccines — Open Access Journal
http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccines
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

 

Open Access Article
Assessment of the Clinical and Economic Impact of Different Immunization Protocols of Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella in Internationally Adopted Children
by Sara Boccalini , Angela Bechini , Cecilia Maria Alimenti , Paolo Bonanni , Luisa Galli and Elena Chiappini
Vaccines 2020, 8(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8010060 (registering DOI) – 01 Feb 2020
Abstract
The appropriate immunization of internationally adopted children (IAC) is currently under debate and different approaches have been suggested. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of different strategies of measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) immunization in IAC in Italy. A decision analysis model was developed to compare three strategies: presumptive immunization, pre-vaccination serotesting and vaccination based on documentation of previous immunization. Main outcomes were the cost of strategy, number of protected IAC, and cost per child protected against MMRV. Moreover, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. The strategy currently recommended in Italy (immunize based on documentation) is less expensive. On the other hand, the pre-vaccination serotesting strategy against MMRV together, improves outcomes with a minimum cost increase, compared with the presumptive immunization strategy and compared with the comparator strategy. From a cost-effectiveness point of view, vaccination based on serotesting results in being the most advantageous strategy compared to presumptive vaccination. By applying a chemiluminescent immunoassay test, the serology strategy resulted to be clinically and economically advantageous. Similar results were obtained excluding children aged <1 year for both serology methods. In conclusion, based on our analyses, considering MMRV vaccine, serotesting strategy appears to be the preferred option in IAC.

The Impact of School and After-School Friendship Networks on Adolescent Vaccination Behavior

Vaccines — Open Access Journal
http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccines
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

 

Open Access Article
The Impact of School and After-School Friendship Networks on Adolescent Vaccination Behavior
by Daniele Mascia , Valentina Iacopino , Emanuela Maria Frisicale , Antonia Iacovelli , Stefania Boccia and Andrea Poscia
Vaccines 2020, 8(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8010055 – 29 Jan 2020
Abstract
Psychological and social characteristics of individuals are important determinants of their health choices and behaviors. Social networks represent “pipes” through which information and opinions circulate and spread out in the social circle surrounding individuals, influencing their propensity toward important health care interventions. This paper aims to explore the relationship between students’ vaccination health choices and their social networks. We administered a questionnaire to students to collect data on individual students’ demographics, knowledge, and attitudes about vaccinations, as well as their social networks. Forty-nine pupils belonging to 4 classrooms in an Italian secondary school were enrolled in the study. We applied a logistic regression quadratic assignment procedure (LR-QAP) by regressing students’ positive responsive behavior similarity as a dependent variable. LRQAP findings indicate that students’ vaccination behavior similarity is significantly associated with after-school social ties and related social mechanisms, suggesting that pupils are more likely to share information and knowledge about health behaviors through social relationships maintained after school hours rather than through those established during the school day. Moreover, we found that vaccination behaviors are more similar for those students having the same ethnicity as well as for those belonging to the same class. Our findings may help policymakers in implementing effective vaccination strategies

Determining Factors for Pertussis Vaccination Policy: A Study in Five EU Countries

Vaccines — Open Access Journal
http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccines
(Accessed 1 Feb 2020)

Open Access Article
Determining Factors for Pertussis Vaccination Policy: A Study in Five EU Countries
by Anabelle Wong , Annick Opinel , Simon Jean-Baptiste Combes , Julie Toubiana and Sylvain Brisse
Vaccines 2020, 8(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8010046 – 26 Jan 2020
Viewed by 278
Abstract
Pertussis vaccination policy varies across Europe, not only in the type of vaccine—whole cell (wP) vs. acellular (aP1/2/3/5)—but also in the schedule and recommendation for parents. This study aims to investigate the determining factors for the type of vaccine, immunization schedule and maternal immunization recommendation. From March to May 2019, experts in national health agencies and major academic or research institutions from Denmark, France, Poland, Sweden and the UK were invited to a semi-structured interview. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts using a codebook formulated by three coders. Inter-coder agreement was assessed. Fifteen expert interviews were conducted. The identified driving factors for pertussis vaccine policy were classified into three domains: scientific factors, sociological factors, and pragmatic factors. The determining factors for the type of vaccine were prescriber’s preference, concern of adverse events following immunization (AEFI), effectiveness, and consideration of other vaccine components in combined vaccines. The determining factors for infant schedule were immunity response and the potential to improve coverage and timeliness. The determining factors for maternal immunization were infant mortality and public acceptability. To conclude, socio-political and pragmatic factors were, besides scientific factors, important in determining the pertussis vaccine type, schedule of childhood immunization and recommendations for parents

From Google Scholar & other sources: Selected Journal Articles, Newsletters, Dissertations, Theses, Commentary

From Google Scholar & other sources: Selected Journal Articles, Newsletters, Dissertations, Theses, Commentary

American Journal of Law & Medicine
First Published January 23, 2020
Research Article
Informed Consent to Vaccination: Theoretical, Legal, and Empirical Insights
Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, Nili Karako-Eyal
https://doi.org/10.1177/0098858819892745 
Abstract
Informed consent matters — so does protecting people from infectious diseases. This paper examines what the appropriate informed consent process for vaccines should look like and how the process is conceptualized by law and health authorities. Drawing on the extensive theoretical and empirical literature on informed consent and vaccination, this article sets out what an ideal informed consent process for vaccination would consist of, highlighting the need for autonomous decisions. To be autonomous, decisions need to be based on full, accessible information and reached without coercion. We suggest that the information provided must address the nature of the procedure — including benefits to the child, benefits to society, and risks. Parents should have their concerns and misconceptions addressed. The information needs to be accessible and include an opportunity to ask questions. Based on this ideal model we examined in detail the legal framework surrounding informed consent to vaccination and the process as conceptualized by health authorities in two countries, Israel and the United States, to assess whether they meet the requirements. These two countries are similar in some of their values, for example, the importance of individual autonomy, and face similar problems related to vaccine hesitancy. At the same time, there are meaningful differences in their vaccine policies and the current structures of their informed consent processes, allowing for a meaningful comparison. We found neither country met our ideal informed consent process, and suggested improvements both to the materials and to the processes used to obtain informed consent.

 

PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News
January 2020, Volume 845, Issue 1, pp 16–16
Clinical Study
Is adolescent immunisation for pertussis cost effective in Canada?
K Anyiwe et al
Background
Adolescent tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (Tdap) immunization helps prevent pertussis infection. Timing of Tdap receipt represents an important facet of successful adolescent pertussis immunization. Potential strategies for timing of vaccine administration are each associated with different benefits – including disease prevention – and costs. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-utility of adolescent pertussis immunization strategies in Canada.
Conclusion
Analysis assumes a policy context where immunization of pregnant women is recommended. Findings suggest that alternate adolescent Tdap vaccine strategies – either immunization of 10 year olds, or removal of the adolescent vaccine – are more cost-effective than the current practice of immunizing 14 year olds.

Media/Policy Watch

Media/Policy Watch
This watch section is intended to alert readers to substantive news, analysis and opinion from the general media and selected think tanks and similar organizations on vaccines, immunization, global public health and related themes. Media Watch is not intended to be exhaustive, but indicative of themes and issues CVEP is actively tracking. This section will grow from an initial base of newspapers, magazines and blog sources, and is segregated from Journal Watch above which scans the peer-reviewed journal ecology.
We acknowledge the Western/Northern bias in this initial selection of titles and invite suggestions for expanded coverage. We are conservative in our outlook in adding news sources which largely report on primary content we are already covering above. Many electronic media sources have tiered, fee-based subscription models for access. We will provide full-text where content is published without restriction, but most publications require registration and some subscription level.

 

The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Ideas
Coronavirus Is Coming—And Trump Isn’t Ready
In order to combat the disease, the president will have to trust the kind of government experts he has disdained and dismissed.
January 30, 2020

 

BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Published Date 30 Jan 2020
Coronavirus: The US laboratory developing a vaccine

 

The Economist
http://www.economist.com/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
[No new, unique, relevant content]

 

Financial Times
http://www.ft.com/home/uk
Coronavirus
The scientist leading the coronavirus vaccine race [CEPI]

Pharmaceutical companies work to repurpose existing genetic technology
January 30, 2020

 

Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/
[No new, unique, relevant content]

 

Foreign Affairs
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
China  
Jan 31, 2020 Snapshot
How to Prepare for a Coronavirus Pandemic
A roadmap for the worst-case scenario.
Tom Inglesby

 

Foreign Policy
http://foreignpolicy.com/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
What Can Be Done to Stop the Wuhan Virus
In a special conference call with subscribers, science columnist Laurie Garrett and senior editor James Palmer discuss the potential global effects of the new coronavirus.
Transcript | FP Editors

 

How China’s Coronavirus Is Spreading—and How to Stop It
Studies are building toward a tentative clinical profile of the outbreak.
Report | Annie Sparrow

 

The Guardian
http://www.guardiannews.com/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Coronavirus outbreak
Paranoia and frustration as China places itself under house arrest
Cities are becoming ghost towns, while at the heart of the outbreak people are being disinfected after taking the bins out
Lily Kuo, Sat 1 Feb 2020

 

New Yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
[No new, unique, relevant content]

 

New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Health
Researchers Are Racing to Make a Coronavirus Vaccine. Will It Help?
New technology and better coordination have sped up development. But a coronavirus vaccine is still months — and most likely years — away.
By Knvul Sheikh and Katie Thomas
Jan. 28

 

Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Governor opposes vote to overturn vaccine exemption law
AUGUSTA, Maine — Governor Janet Mills said Friday she opposes a referendum that would overturn Maine’s law eliminating religious and philosophical exemptions for vaccinations.
In a radio address, Mills, a Democrat, said she signed the law last year to better protect the health and welfare of residents across Maine.
Jan 31, 2020

Think Tanks et al

Think Tanks et al

Brookings
http://www.brookings.edu/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
[No new relevant content]

 

Center for Global Development
http://www.cgdev.org/page/press-center
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
January 31, 2020
Coronavirus and Low-Income Countries: Ready to Respond?
As the first suspected cases of the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV are investigated in Ivory Coast and Angola, none of the 45 low-income countries that have undertaken a national preparedness assessment have been qualified as ready to respond.
Amanda Glassman

 

CSIS
https://www.csis.org/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Critical Questions
The Novel Coronavirus Outbreak
January 28, 2020 |
By J. Stephen Morrison, Jude Blanchette, Scott Kennedy, Stephanie Segal

 

Council on Foreign Relations
http://www.cfr.org/
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
January 30, 2020
Health
Refuge From Disease
Mitigating potential communicable disease in refugee populations is a subset of efforts for human rights, equality, and dignity. A basic multilateral framework could improve health care in these situ…
Report by Swee Kheng Khor and David L. Heymann
January 30, 2020

Public Health Threats and Pandemics
The World Health Organization
Since its postwar founding, the UN agency has garnered both praise and criticism for its response to international public health crises.
Backgrounder by CFR.org Editors

 

Kaiser Family Foundation
https://www.kff.org/search/?post_type=press-release
Accessed 1 Feb 2020
[No new relevant content]

Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review :: 1 Feb 2020

.– Request an Email Summary: Vaccines and Global Health : The Week in Review is published as a single email summary, scheduled for release each Saturday evening before midnight (EDT in the U.S.). If you would like to receive the email version, please send your request to david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org.

 pdf version A pdf of the current issue is available here: Vaccines and Global Health_The Week in Review_1 Feb 2020

– blog edition: comprised of the approx. 35+ entries posted below.

– Twitter:  Readers can also follow developments on twitter: @vaxethicspolicy.
.
– Links:  We endeavor to test each link as we incorporate it into any post, but recognize that some links may become “stale” as publications and websites reorganize content over time. We apologize in advance for any links that may not be operative. We believe the contextual information in a given post should allow retrieval, but please contact us as above for assistance if necessary.

Support this knowledge-sharing service: Your financial support helps us cover our costs and to address a current shortfall in our annual operating budget. Click here to donate and thank you in advance for your contribution.

.
David R. Curry, MS
Executive Director
Center for Vaccine Ethics and Policy

Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review :: 15 February 2020

.– Request an Email Summary: Vaccines and Global Health : The Week in Review is published as a single email summary, scheduled for release each Saturday evening before midnight (EDT in the U.S.). If you would like to receive the email version, please send your request to david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org.

 pdf version A pdf of the current issue is available here:Vaccines and Global Health_The Week in Review_15 Feb 2020

– blog edition: comprised of the approx. 35+ entries posted below.

– Twitter:  Readers can also follow developments on twitter: @vaxethicspolicy.
.
– Links:  We endeavor to test each link as we incorporate it into any post, but recognize that some links may become “stale” as publications and websites reorganize content over time. We apologize in advance for any links that may not be operative. We believe the contextual information in a given post should allow retrieval, but please contact us as above for assistance if necessary.

Support this knowledge-sharing service: Your financial support helps us cover our costs and to address a current shortfall in our annual operating budget. Click here to donate and thank you in advance for your contribution.

.
David R. Curry, MS
Executive Director
Center for Vaccine Ethics and Policy

Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review :: 25 January 2020

.– Request an Email Summary: Vaccines and Global Health : The Week in Review is published as a single email summary, scheduled for release each Saturday evening before midnight (EDT in the U.S.). If you would like to receive the email version, please send your request to david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org.

 pdf version A pdf of the current issue is available here: Vaccines and Global Health_The Week in Review_25 Jan 2020

– blog edition: comprised of the approx. 35+ entries posted below.

– Twitter:  Readers can also follow developments on twitter: @vaxethicspolicy.
.
– Links:  We endeavor to test each link as we incorporate it into any post, but recognize that some links may become “stale” as publications and websites reorganize content over time. We apologize in advance for any links that may not be operative. We believe the contextual information in a given post should allow retrieval, but please contact us as above for assistance if necessary.

Support this knowledge-sharing service: Your financial support helps us cover our costs and to address a current shortfall in our annual operating budget. Click here to donate and thank you in advance for your contribution.

.
David R. Curry, MS
Executive Director
Center for Vaccine Ethics and Policy

UNICEF mourns death of Dr. Peter Salama :: WHO mourns passing of Dr Peter Salama

Milestones :: Perspectives :: Research

 

::::::

UNICEF mourns death of Dr. Peter Salama
Statement by Henrietta Fore, UNICEF Executive Director
NEW YORK, 24 January 2020 – “The entire UNICEF family is deeply saddened by the sudden death of Dr. Peter Salama from a heart attack in Geneva.

“Pete was a tireless advocate for children, a committed humanitarian and a highly respected professional.

“He was an inspiring and caring leader across a number of roles within UNICEF, as Chief of Health and Nutrition in Afghanistan, as Representative in Ethiopia and Zimbabwe, as Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa in Jordan, as Global Chief of Health and HIV and as Global Ebola Coordinator in New York.

“Pete left UNICEF in 2016 to join the World Health Organization as Executive Director of its Health Emergencies Programme before becoming Executive Director of its Division of Universal Health Coverage – Life Course.

“All of us who had the privilege of working with Pete knew that he embodied the spirit of UNICEF like few others.

“Our most heartfelt condolences to his wife, his three children and all his friends and colleagues around the world. He will be sorely missed.”

WHO mourns passing of Dr Peter Salama

24 January 2020 – Statement

The World Health Organization announces with deep sadness the sudden death of Dr Peter Salama, Executive Director of WHO’s Division for Universal Health Coverage – Life Course.

The Organization extends its most profound sympathies and condolences to Dr Salama’s family, friends and colleagues. He was 51 and leaves behind his wife and three children.

“Pete embodied everything that is best about WHO and the United Nations – professionalism, commitment and compassion,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “Our hearts are broken.”

Dr Salama, a medical epidemiologist from Australia, joined WHO in 2016 as Executive Director of WHO’s Health Emergencies programme, which he led until 2019.

Before joining WHO, Dr Salama was Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa at UNICEF, an organization that he joined in 2002.

Dr Salama led UNICEF’s global response to Ebola, served as its Representative in Ethiopia and Zimbabwe (2009–2015), Chief of Global Health and Principal Advisor on HIV/AIDS in New York (2004–2009), and Chief of Health and Nutrition in Afghanistan (2002–2004).

He had also worked with Médecins Sans Frontières and Concern Worldwide in several countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Wuhan+ – Novel Coronavirus [2019-nCoV]

Wuhan+ – Novel Coronavirus [2019-nCoV]

 
Situation report – 4 – WHO
Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
24 January 2020
[Excerpt]
PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE

WHO:
:: WHO has published an updated advice for international traffic in relation to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV;

:: WHO has been in regular and direct contact with Chinese as well as Japanese, Korean and Thai authorities since the reporting of these cases. The three countries have shared information with WHO under the International Health Regulations. WHO is also informing other countries about the situation and providing support as requested;

:: On 2 January, the incident management system was activated across the three levels of WHO (country office, regional office and headquarters);

:: Developed the surveillance case definitions for human infection with 2019-nCoV and is updating it as the new information becomes available;

:: Developed interim guidance for laboratory diagnosis, clinical management, infection prevention and control in health care settings, home care for mild patients, risk communication and community engagement;

:: Prepared disease commodity package for supplies necessary in identification and management of confirmed patients;

:: Provided recommendations to reduce risk of transmission from animals to humans;

:: Utilizing global expert networks and partnerships for laboratory, infection prevention and control, clinical management and mathematical modelling;

:: Activation of R&D blueprint to accelerate diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics;

:: WHO is working with our networks of researchers and other experts to coordinate global work on surveillance, epidemiology, modelling, diagnostics, clinical care and treatment, and other ways to identify, manage the disease and limit onward transmission. WHO has issued interim guidance for countries, updated to take into account the current situation.

 
::::::
 
National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China
http://en.nhc.gov.cn/

Data key to staying ahead of pneumonia
China will continue to publicly post daily information on the new viral pneumonia outbreak and prevention and control measures taken by the government, the National Health Commission said on Jan 22.

 
::::::
 
CEPI to fund three programmes to develop vaccines against the novel coronavirus, nCoV-2019
OSLO, NORWAY. Jan 23, 2020 – CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, today announced the initiation of three programmes to develop vaccines against the novel coronavirus, nCoV-2019.

The programmes will leverage rapid response platforms already supported by CEPI as well as a new partnership. The aim is to advance nCoV-2019 vaccine candidates into clinical testing as quickly as possible.

The nCoV-2019 vaccine development efforts will build on existing partnerships with Inovio (Nasdaq: INO) and The University of Queensland (located in Brisbane, Australia). In addition, CEPI today announces a new partnership with Moderna, Inc., (Nasdaq: MRNA) and the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

All of these are pioneering technologies designed to speed up the development of vaccines against emerging threats such as nCoV-2019.

“Given the rapid global spread of the nCoV-2019 virus the world needs to act quickly and in unity to tackle this disease. Our intention with this work is to leverage our work on the MERS coronavirus and rapid response platforms to speed up vaccine development. There are no guarantees of success, but we hope this work could provide a significant and important step forward in developing a vaccine for this disease. Our aspiration with these technologies is to bring a new pathogen from gene sequence to clinical testing in 16 weeks – which is significantly shorter than where we are now,” said Richard Hatchett, CEO of CEPI.

The term “platform technology” broadly refers to systems that use the same basic components as a backbone but can be adapted for use against different pathogens as needed by inserting new genetic or protein sequences.

CEPI has moved with great urgency and in coordination with WHO, who is leading the development of a coordinated international response, to promote the development of new vaccines against the emerging threat of nCoV-2019. The novel coronavirus represents the first new epidemic disease of note to emerge since CEPI’s founding at Davos in 2017, with the express intent that it should be ready to respond to epidemics rapidly and effectively, wherever they emerge…

 
::::::
 

CDC: Transcript of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Response

Friday, January 24, 2020
[Excerpt]
Dr. Nancy Messonnier:

…To date, we have 63 of what we are calling patients under investigation or PUIs from 22 states.  So far, only two have been confirmed positive and 11 tested negative.  We anticipate by next week we’ll begin regular reporting of case information on our website.  There are likely to be many more PUIs identified in the coming days.

We have faced similar public health challenges before.  Those outbreaks were complex and required a comprehensive public health response.  This is what we are preparing for.  We have an aggressive response with the goal of identifying potential cases early. We want to make sure these patients get the best and most appropriate care.  This is a rapidly changing situation both abroad and domestically, and we are still learning.  Let’s remember this virus is identified within the past month and there is much we don’t know yet.  We are expecting more cases in the U.S., and we are likely going to see some cases among close contacts of travelers and human to human transmission.

Our goal is always to protect the health of Americans.  We at CDC have our best people working on this problem.  We have support across the entirety of the Federal Government.  We have one of the strongest public health systems in the world.  Again, while there are many unknowns, CDC believes that the immediate risk to the American public continues to be low at this time, but that the situation continues to evolve rapidly.

CDC recommends travelers avoid all non-essential travel to Wuhan.  We also recommend people traveling to other parts of China practice certain health precautions, like avoiding contact with people who are sick and practicing good hand hygiene.  Returning travelers with symptoms, or close contact with people confirmed with coronavirus, may be asked to take precautionary measures and there may be some disruptions.  I want to thank those people in advance for their cooperation.  Everyone can do their part here.

Although Chinese officials have closed transport within and out of Wuhan, China, CDC will continue to conduct enhanced screening at five designated airports: New York JFK, San Francisco, LAX, Chicago O’Hare and Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson. We are currently evaluating the extent and duration of this enhanced screening.  Every day we learn more and every day we assess to see if our guidance or response can be improved.  As the response evolves, CDC will continue our aggressive public health response strategy.  Thank you…

::::::

 

Statement on the meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

23 January 2020

Statement, Geneva, Switzerland

The meeting of the Emergency Committee convened by the WHO Director-General under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus 2019 in the People’s Republic of China, with exportations currently reported in the Republic of Korea, Japan, Thailand and Singapore, took place on Wednesday, 22 January 2020, from 12:00 to 16:30 Geneva time (CEST) and on Thursday, 23 January 2020, from 12:00 to 15:10. The Committee’s role is to give advice to the Director-General, who makes the final decision on the determination of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). The Committee also provides public health advice or suggests formal temporary recommendations as appropriate.

Proceedings of the meeting

Members and advisors of the Emergency Committee were convened by teleconference.

The Director-General welcomed the Committee and thanked them for their support. He turned the meeting over to the Chair, Professor Didier Houssin.

Professor Houssin also welcomed the Committee and gave the floor to the Secretariat.

On 22 January, representatives of WHO’s legal department and the department of compliance, risk management, and ethics briefed the Committee members on their roles and responsibilities.

Committee members were reminded of their duty of confidentiality and their responsibility to  disclose personal, financial, or professional connections that might be seen to constitute a conflict of interest. Each member who was present was surveyed and no conflicts of interest were judged to be relevant to the meeting.

The Chair then reviewed the agenda for the meeting and introduced the presenters.

On 23 January, representatives of the Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China, Japan, Thailand and the Republic of Korea updated the committee on the situation in their countries. There have been increased numbers of reported cases in China, with 557 confirmed as of today.

Conclusions and Advice

On 22 January, the members of the Emergency Committee expressed divergent views on whether this event constitutes a PHEIC or not. At that time, the advice was that the event did not constitute a PHEIC, but the Committee members agreed on the urgency of the situation and suggested that the Committee should be reconvened in a matter of days to examine the situation further.

After the announcement of new containment measures in Wuhan on 22 January, the Director-General asked the Emergency Committee to reconvene on 23 January to study the information provided by Chinese authorities about the most recent epidemiological evolution and the risk-management measures taken.

Chinese authorities presented new epidemiological information that revealed an increase in the number of cases, of suspected cases, of affected provinces, and the proportion of deaths in currently reported cases of 4% (17 of 557). They reported fourth-generation cases in Wuhan and second-generation cases outside Wuhan, as well as some clusters outside Hubei province. They explained that strong containment measures (closure of public-transportation systems in Wuhan City, as well as other nearby cities). After this presentation, the EC was informed about the evolution in Japan, Republic of Korea, and Thailand, and that one new possible case had been identified in Singapore.

The Committee welcomed the efforts made by China to investigate and contain the current outbreak.

   The following elements were considered as critical:

:: Human-to-human transmission is occurring and a preliminary R0 estimate of 1.4-2.5 was presented. Amplification has occurred in one health care facility. Of confirmed cases, 25% are reported to be severe. The source is still unknown (most likely an animal reservoir) and the extent of human-to-human transmission is still not clear. 

:: Several members considered that it is still too early to declare a PHEIC, given its restrictive and binary nature. 

Based on these divergent views, the EC formulates the following advice:

To WHO

The Committee stands ready to be reconvened in approximately ten days’ time, or earlier should the Director-General deem it necessary.

The Committee urged to support ongoing efforts through a WHO international multidisciplinary mission, including national experts. The mission would review and support efforts to investigate the animal source of the outbreak, the extent of human-to-human transmission, the screening efforts in other provinces of China, the enhancement of surveillance for severe acute respiratory infections in these regions, and to reinforce containment and mitigation measures. A mission would provide information to the international community to aid in understanding of the situation and its potential public health impact.

WHO should continue to provide all necessary technical and operational support to respond to this outbreak, including with its extensive networks of partners and collaborating institutions, to implement a comprehensive risk communication strategy, and to allow for the advancement of research and scientific developments in relation to this novel coronavirus.

In the face of an evolving epidemiological situation and the restrictive binary nature of declaring a PHEIC or not, WHO should consider a more nuanced system, which would allow an intermediate level of alert. Such a system would better reflect the severity of an outbreak, its impact, and the required measures, and would facilitate improved international coordination, including research efforts for developing medical counter measures.

To the People’s Republic of China

:: Provide more information on cross-government risk management measures, including crisis management systems at national, provincial, and city levels, and other domestic measures.

:: Enhance rational public health measures for containment and mitigation of the current outbreak.

:: Enhance surveillance and active case finding across China, particularly during the Chinese New Year celebration.

:: Collaborate with WHO and partners to conduct investigations to understand the epidemiology and the evolution of this outbreak, including specific investigations to understand the source of the novel coronavirus, notably the animal reservoir, and animals involved in the zoonotic transmission, as well as the understanding of its full potential for human-to-human transmission, and where transmission is taking place, the clinical features associated with infection, and the required treatment to reduce morbidity and mortality.

:: Continue to share full data on all cases with WHO, including genome sequences, and details of any health care worker infections or clusters.

:: Conduct exit screening at international airports and ports in the affected provinces, with the aims early detection of symptomatic travelers for further evaluation and treatment, while minimizing interference with international traffic.

:: Encourage screening at domestic airports, railway stations, and long-distance bus stations as necessary.

To other countries

It is expected that further international exportation of cases may appear in any country. Thus, all countries should be prepared for containment, including active surveillance, early detection, isolation and case management, contact tracing and prevention of onward spread of 2019-nCoV infection, and to share full data with WHO.

Countries are required to share information with WHO according to the IHR.

Technical advice is available here.  Countries should place particular emphasis on reducing human infection, prevention of secondary transmission and international spread and contributing to the international response though multi-sectoral communication and collaboration and active participation in increasing knowledge on the virus and the disease, as well as advancing research. Countries should also follow travel advice from WHO.

To the global community

As this is a new coronavirus, and it has been previously shown that similar coronaviruses required substantial efforts for regular information sharing and research, the global community should continue to demonstrate solidarity and cooperation, in compliance with Article 44 of the IHR (2005), in supporting each other on the identification of the source of this new virus, its full potential for human-to-human transmission, preparedness for potential importation of cases, and research for developing necessary treatment.

The Director-General thanked the Committee for its advice.

WHO – 146th session of the Executive Board

WHO – 146th session of the Executive Board
Geneva, 3–8 February 2020.
Main Documents [selected documents/Editor’s text bolding]]

EB146/1 Rev.1
Provisional agenda

EB146/1(annotated)
Provisional agenda (annotated)

EB146/6
Follow-up to the high-level meetings of the United Nations General Assembly on health-related issues
Universal health coverage: moving together to build a healthier world

EB146/7
Follow-up to the high-level meetings of the United Nations General Assembly on health-related issues
Political declaration of the third high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases

EB146/8
Global vaccine action plan

EB146/9
Accelerating the elimination of cervical cancer as a global public health problem

EB146/10
Ending tuberculosis
Progress in implementing the global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015 (the End TB Strategy)

EB146/11
Ending tuberculosis
Draft global strategy for tuberculosis research and innovation

EB146/14
Neglected tropical diseases

EB146/15
Global strategy and plan of action on public health, innovation and intellectual property

EB146/16
Public health emergencies: preparedness and response
Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee for the WHO Health Emergencies Programme

EB146/17
Public health preparedness and response
WHO’s work in health emergencies

EB146/18
Influenza preparedness

EB146/19
The public health implications of implementation of the Nagoya Protocol

EB146/20
Public health emergencies: preparedness and response
Cholera prevention and control

EB146/21
Poliomyelitis
Polio eradication

EB146/22
Poliomyelitis
Polio transition planning and polio post-certification

Emergencies

Emergencies

Ebola – DRC+
Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)

Ebola Outbreak in DRC 76: 21 January 2020
Situation Update
From 13 to 19 January 2020, 15 new confirmed cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) were reported from North Kivu Province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The cases were reported from Beni (9 cases) and Mabalako (6 cases) Health Zones and all were linked to a confirmed case in a known chain of transmission…

::::::

POLIO
Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)
http://polioeradication.org/polio-today/polio-now/this-week/

Polio this week as of 22 January 2020
:: The GPEI Polio Partners Group convened the eighth annual technical workshop on 6 December 2019 where a global overview of the status of poliovirus detection was presented among other polio updates. The meeting presentations are now available here.

Summary of new viruses this week (AFP cases and ES positives):
:: Afghanistan: one WPV1 case and three WPV1-positive environmental samples
:: Pakistan: two WPV1 cases, four WPV1-positive environmental samples and six cVDPV2 cases
:: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo):  ten cVDPV2 cases
:: Côte d’Ivoire: two cVDPV2 positive environmental samples
:: Ghana: two cVDPV2 positive environmental samples
:: Malaysia: two cVDPV1 cases
:: Philippines: two cVDPV2 cases and two cVDPV2 positive environmental samples
:: Togo: one cVDPV2 case

::::::

Rotary and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation extending fundraising partnership to eradicate polio
Partnership will infuse an additional US$450 million into global polio eradication effort
EVANSTON, Ill., Jan. 22, 2020 /PRNewswire/ — Rotary and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are renewing their longstanding partnership to end polio, announcing a joint commitment of up to $450 million to support the global polio eradication effort…
…In addition to the extended funding partnership with the Gates Foundation, Rotary is also announcing US$45 million in funding for polio eradication efforts in countries throughout Africa (Angola, Ethiopia, Mali, Nigeria, Somalia and South Sudan), and Asia (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Pakistan and the Philippines). The funding will help support crucial polio eradication activities such as immunization and disease detection, research, and community mobilization…

::::::
::::::

Editor’s Note:
WHO has posted a refreshed emergencies page which presents an updated listing of Grade 3,2,1 emergencies as below.

WHO Grade 3 Emergencies [to 25 Jan 2020]

Democratic Republic of the Congo
:: Ebola Outbreak in DRC 76: 21 January 2020
[See Ebola above for detail]

Mozambique floods – No new digest announcements identified
Nigeria – No new digest announcements identified
Somalia – No new digest announcements identified
South Sudan – No new digest announcements identified
Syrian Arab Republic – No new digest announcements identified
Yemen – No new digest announcements identified

::::::

WHO Grade 2 Emergencies [to 25 Jan 2020]
Angola
:: Angola honours WHO Representative at end of mission 22 January 2020

Measles in Europe
:: Strengthening response to measles outbreak in Ukraine 22-01-2020

Afghanistan – No new digest announcements identified
Burkina Faso [in French] – No new digest announcements identified
Burundi – No new digest announcements identified
Cameroon – No new digest announcements identified
Central African Republic – No new digest announcements identified
Ethiopia – No new digest announcements identified
HIV in Pakistan – No new digest announcements identified
Iran floods 2019 – No new digest announcements identified
Iraq – No new digest announcements identified
Libya – No new digest announcements identified
Malawi floods – No new digest announcements identified
MERS-CoV – No new digest announcements identified
Myanmar – No new digest announcements identified
Niger – No new digest announcements identified
occupied Palestinian territory – No new digest announcements identified
Sudan – No new digest announcements identified
Ukraine – No new digest announcements identified
Zimbabwe – No new digest announcements identified

::::::

WHO Grade 1 Emergencies [to 25 Jan 2020]

Chad – No new digest announcements identified
Djibouti – No new digest announcements identified
Kenya – No new digest announcements identified
Mali – No new digest announcements identified
Namibia – viral hepatitis – No new digest announcements identified
Tanzania – No new digest announcements identified

::::::
::::::

UN OCHA – L3 Emergencies
The UN and its humanitarian partners are currently responding to three ‘L3’ emergencies. This is the global humanitarian system’s classification for the response to the most severe, large-scale humanitarian crises. 
Syrian Arab Republic – No new digest announcements identified
Yemen – No new digest announcements identified

::::::

UN OCHA – Corporate Emergencies
When the USG/ERC declares a Corporate Emergency Response, all OCHA offices, branches and sections provide their full support to response activities both at HQ and in the field.
CYCLONE IDAI and Kenneth – No new digest announcements identified
EBOLA OUTBREAK IN THE DRC – No new digest announcements identified

::::::
::::::

WHO & Regional Offices [to 25 Jan 2020]

WHO & Regional Offices [to 25 Jan 2020]
Message for World Leprosy Day 2020
24 January 2020 Statement

Effective outbreak response reduces the risk of measles spread in the Pacific
Joint WHO-UNICEF statement on Pacific measles situation
In 2019, the Pacific saw the re-emergence of measles, with outbreaks declared in Samoa, Tonga, Fiji and American Samoa, and cases reported in Kiribati. For Samoa, the country experienced a widescale measles outbreak which had significant impact upon the country’s population and health system. The disease has cost lives, with infants and young children being most affected.
In response to the identification of measles in the region, many Pacific countries and areas have made serious efforts to close immunity gaps in their population and strengthen infectious disease prevention, surveillance and response systems. These efforts align to the core public health capacities required by all countries under the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, and critical to preventing and controlling the spread of infectious diseases, such as measles.
The governments of Samoa, Tonga and Fiji, have conducted vaccination campaigns aimed at closing immunity gaps in their populations to stop the transmission of the virus. These immunization activities are bringing the outbreaks under control. In Samoa, the mass immunization campaign which targeted individuals aged six months to 60 years achieved 95 per cent vaccination coverage, the rate needed to prevent measles transmission in a population.  Fiji and Tonga continue immunizing those most at risk of measles to meet the target of 95 per cent and ensure that populations are protected. Other Pacific countries and areas have also conducted supplementary immunization activities to reduce the risk of potential measles outbreaks.
Due to the public health efforts of Pacific countries and areas, the risk of measles spreading in Samoa and in other Pacific Island countries and areas has notably reduced…

 

::::::

Weekly Epidemiological Record, 24 January 2020, vol. 95, 04 (pp. 25–36)
Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety, 4–5 December 2019

 

::::::

Calls for consultants / proposals
Health impact and cost-effectiveness of introduction of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis booster doses in low- and middle-income countries pdf, 1.05Mb
Deadline for applications: 14 February 2020

 

WHO African Regions Immunization Technical Advisory Group (RITAG)
:: Call for nominations pdf, 147kb Deadline for applications: 28 February 2020
:: RITAG Terms of Reference pdf, 211kb
:: RITAG application annexes pdf, 91kb

 

::::::

WHO Regional Offices
Selected Press Releases, Announcements
WHO African Region AFRO
No new digest content identified.

WHO Region of the Americas PAHO
:: PAHO Director urges readiness to detect cases of new coronavirus in the Americas (01/24/2020)
:: Haiti reaches one-year free of Cholera (01/23/2020)
:: PAHO issues epidemiological alert on Novel Coronavirus for the Americas (01/20/2020)

WHO South-East Asia Region SEARO
No new digest content identified.

WHO European Region EURO
:: 2019-nCoV outbreak: first cases confirmed in Europe 25-01-2020
:: Novel coronavirus outbreak in China – What does it mean for Europe? 24-01-2020
:: New report reveals the role of physical activity in preventing and treating cardiovascular diseases 22-01-2020
:: Romania: tuberculosis patients to avoid unnecessary hospitalization 21-01-2020

WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region EMRO
No new digest content identified.

WHO Western Pacific Region
No new digest content identified.

CDC/ACIP [to 25 Jan 2020]

CDC/ACIP [to 25 Jan 2020]
http://www.cdc.gov/media/index.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html
Latest News Releases
Transcript of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Response
Friday, January 24, 2020
[See Milestones above for detail]

Marburg Virus Found Circulating in Bats in West Africa
Friday, January 24, 2020

Second Travel-related Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Detected in United States
Friday, January 24, 2020

Transcript of Update on 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Tuesday, January 21, 2020

First Travel-related Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Detected in United States
Tuesday, January 21, 2020