Media/Policy Watch

Media/Policy Watch
This watch section is intended to alert readers to substantive news, analysis and opinion from the general media and selected think tanks and similar organizations on vaccines, immunization, global public health and related themes. Media Watch is not intended to be exhaustive, but indicative of themes and issues CVEP is actively tracking. This section will grow from an initial base of newspapers, magazines and blog sources, and is segregated from Journal Watch above which scans the peer-reviewed journal ecology.
We acknowledge the Western/Northern bias in this initial selection of titles and invite suggestions for expanded coverage. We are conservative in our outlook in adding news sources which largely report on primary content we are already covering above. Many electronic media sources have tiered, fee-based subscription models for access. We will provide full-text where content is published without restriction, but most publications require registration and some subscription level.
 

The Economist
http://www.economist.com/
Accessed 9 December 2017
Saving the children: High hopes for a malaria vaccine
December 2017
Geoffrey Carr
…Although the deployment of RTS,S in 2018—in Ghana, Kenya and Malawi—will only be a pilot scheme intended to test the vaccine’s effectiveness in the rough and tumble of African clinical life, it will be a big one. The Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme, as it is known, will recruit 360,000 children, aged between five months and 17 months, to receive a series of four doses of RTS,S. A similar number of other children, matched for age and circumstances, will be observed without vaccination, in order that comparisons can be made. The programme will be run by the World Health Organisation and the bills paid by three transnational health initiatives, Gavi, the Global Fund and Unitaid…

 
The Guardian
http://www.guardiannews.com/
Accessed 9 December 2017
HPV vaccine
The Observer
Fears for women’s health as parents reject HPV vaccine
Three nations blame social media for fall in number of girls given cervical cancer jabs
3 December 2017
Health officials have become increasingly alarmed at campaigns aimed at blocking the take-up of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, which protects women against cervical cancer.
Three leading nations have now seen major reductions in the take-up of the vaccine and a growing number of doctors fear its use could be blocked elsewhere, despite its capacity to provide protection against a condition that kills hundreds of thousands of women a year.
Last week, doctors and health officials gathered in Dublin – centre of one of the most vociferous anti-vaccine campaigns – to discuss future tactics. Many believe the use of social media has added new impetus to anti-vaccine campaigners’ protests, and that this factor has been closely involved in the success of the attacks that have been made on immunisation programmes.
“Whenever a new vaccine is introduced, there is always a group of people who say it is unsafe,” said Professor Margaret Stanley of Cambridge University. “But the HPV vaccine seems to raise extraordinary levels of hostility.”
Japan, Ireland and Denmark have already witnessed sustained campaigns that have seen take-up rates plummet. (UK take-up rates are high.) In each case, the vaccine – which scientists insist is safe – has been linked to alleged cases of seizures, walking problems, and neurological issues. Photographs have been exchanged and video clips uploaded to YouTube…

The Health Care Blog
http://thehealthcareblog.com/
Accessed 9 December 2017
A Clinical Trial By Any Other Name …
Dec 7, 2017
By ARTHUR CAPLAN and KELLY McBRIDE FOLKERS
Sanofi Pasteur, Dengvaxia®, Philippines
 
 
New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/
Accessed 9 December 2017
Philippines to Seek Refund of $59 Million From Sanofi Amid Vaccine Risk
The Philippines will seek the return of 3 billion pesos ($59 million) it paid French drugmaker Sanofi for a dengue vaccine used to immunise hundreds of thousands of children that Sanofi has said could worsen the disease in some cases.
December 08, 2017 – By REUTERS – Business Day

Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Accessed 9 December 2017
The moral differences between pro- and anti-vaccine parents
4 December 2017
By Lena H. Sun
When it comes to persuading parents in the United States who are hesitant about vaccinating their children, the public health messages often rely on facts and science to explain how immunization not only protects those children but also shields other vulnerable people from dangerous infectious diseases.
But information campaigns that emphasize fairness or preventing harm sometimes backfire and can worsen vaccine hesitancy, research has shown. A study published Monday in Nature Human Behaviour suggests a more effective way to reach vaccine-hesitant parents may be to focus on two potentially powerful moral values that underlie people’s attitudes and judgments: individual liberty and purity.
Compared with parents who approve of vaccines, parents who are most reluctant to vaccinate are strongly concerned with liberty and purity, the researchers found. In this framework, liberty is associated with belief in personal responsibility, freedom, property rights and resistance to state involvement in citizens’ lives. Concerns about purity center on boundaries and protection from contamination.