HIV prevention research and COVID-19: putting ethics guidance to the test

BMC Medical Ethics
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedethics/content
(Accessed 30 Jan 2021)

 

HIV prevention research and COVID-19: putting ethics guidance to the test
Critical public health measures implemented to mitigate the spread of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have disrupted health research worldwide, including HIV prevention research. While general guidance has been issued for the responsible conduct of research in these challenging circumstances, the contours of the dueling COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS pandemics raise some critical ethical issues for HIV prevention research. In this paper, we use the recently updated HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) Ethics Guidance Document (EGD) to situate and analyze key ethical challenges related to the conduct of HIV prevention research during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as identify potential areas for refinement of the guidance document based on this unprecedented state of affairs.
Authors: Stuart Rennie, Wairimu Chege, Leah A. Schrumpf, Florencia Luna, Robert Klitzman, Ernest Moseki, Brandon Brown, Steven Wakefield and Jeremy Sugarman
Content type: Debate
25 January 2021

Potential effect modification of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy by household socio-economic status

BMC Public Health
http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles

 

Research
Potential effect modification of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy by household socio-economic status
In the phase III RTS,S /AS01 trial, significant heterogeneity in efficacy of the vaccine across study sites was seen. Question on whether variations in socio – economic status (SES) of participant contributed …
Authors: Stephaney Gyaase, Kwaku Poku Asante, Elisha Adeniji, Owusu Boahen, Matthew Cairns and Seth Owusu-Agyei
Citation: BMC Public Health 2021 21:240
Content type: Research article
Published on: 28 January 2021

Impact of video-led educational intervention on the uptake of influenza vaccine among adults aged 60 years and above in China: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BMC Public Health
http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles

 

Impact of video-led educational intervention on the uptake of influenza vaccine among adults aged 60 years and above in China: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Influenza is a global health threat to older adults, and the influenza vaccine is the most effective approach to prevent influenza infection. However, influenza vaccination coverage among Chinese older adults …
Authors: Pengchao Li, Khezar Hayat, Minghuan Jiang, Zhaojing Pu, Xuelin Yao, Yamin Zou, Krizzia Lambojon, Yifan Huang, Jinghua Hua, Hanri Xiao, Fulei Du, Li Shi, Panpan Zhai, Wenjing Ji, Zhitong Feng, Yilin Gong…
Citation: BMC Public Health 2021 21:222
Content type: Study protocol
Published on: 27 January 2021

Real-time monitoring of the rollout of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in rural India using a digital tracking platform

Gates Open Research
https://gatesopenresearch.org/browse/articles
[Accessed 30 Jan 2021]

 

Research Article metrics AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Real-time monitoring of the rollout of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in rural India using a digital tracking platform [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Ruchit Nagar, Mohammad Sarparajul Ambiya, Saachi Dalal, Pawan Singh Bhadauriya, Hamid Abdullah, Mohammed Shahnawaz, Daniel M. Weinberger
Peer Reviewers Invited
Funders: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Global Alliance for Vaccines
PUBLISHED 25 Jan 2021

A call to advance and translate research into policy on governance, ethics, and conflicts of interest in public health: the GECI-PH network

Globalization and Health
http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/
[Accessed 30 Jan 2021]

 

Commentary
A call to advance and translate research into policy on governance, ethics, and conflicts of interest in public health: the GECI-PH network
Authors: Rima Nakkash, Melissa Mialon, Jihad Makhoul, Monika Arora, Rima Afifi, Abeer Al Halabi and Leslie London
25 January 2021
Abstract
Efforts to adopt public health policies that would limit the consumption of unhealthy commodities, such as tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food products, are often undermined by private sector actors whose profits depend on the sales of such products. There is ample evidence showing that these corporations not only try to influence public health policy; they also shape research, practice and public opinion. Globalization, trade and investment agreements, and privatization, amongst other factors, have facilitated the growing influence of private sector actors on public health at both national and global levels. Protecting and promoting public health from the undue influence of private sector actors is thus an urgent task. With this backdrop in mind, we launched the “Governance, Ethics, and Conflicts of Interest in Public Health” Network (GECI-PH Network) in 2018. Our network seeks to share, collate, promote and foster knowledge on governance, ethical, and conflicts of interest that arise in the interactions between private sectors actors and those in public health, and within multi-stakeholder mechanisms where dividing lines between different actors are often blurred. We call for strong guidance to address and manage the influence of private sector actors on public health policy, research and practice, and for dialogue on this important topic. Our network recently reached 119 members. Membership is diverse in composition and expertise, location, and institutions. We invite colleagues with a common interest to join our network.

Disability inclusion in humanitarian action

Humanitarian Exchange Magazine
Number 78, October 2020
https://odihpn.org/magazine/inclusion-of-persons-with-disabilities-in-humanitarian-action-what-now/

 

Disability inclusion in humanitarian action
by HPN October 2020
The theme of this edition of Humanitarian Exchange, co-edited with Sherin Alsheikh Ahmed from Islamic Relief Worldwide, is disability inclusion in humanitarian action. Persons with disabilities are not only disproportionately impacted by conflicts, disasters and other emergencies, but also face barriers to accessing humanitarian assistance. At the same time, global commitments and standards and the IASC Guidelines on the inclusion of persons with disabilities in humanitarian action all emphasise how persons with disabilities are also active agents of change. Disability and age-focused organisations have led on testing and demonstrating how inclusion can be done better. Yet despite this progress, challenges to effective inclusion remain.

As Kirstin Lange notes in the lead article, chief among these challenges is humanitarian agencies’ lack of engagement with organisations of persons with disabilities. Simione Bula, Elizabeth Morgan and Teresa Thomson look at disability inclusion in humanitarian response in the Pacific, and Kathy Al Jubeh and Alradi Abdalla argue for a ‘participation revolution’, building on learning from the gender movement. Tchaurea Fleury and Sulayman AbdulMumuni Ujah outline how the Bridge Article 11 training initiative is encouraging constructive exchange between humanitarian and disability actors. The lack of good, disaggregated data is highlighted by Sarah Collinson; Frances Hill, Jim Cranshaw and Carys Hughes emphasise the need for training resources in local languages and accessible formats; and Sophie Van Eetvelt and colleagues report on a review of the evidence on inclusion of people with disabilities and older people.

Rebecca Molyneux and co-authors analyse the findings of a review of a DFID programme in north-east Nigeria, while Carolin Funke highlights the importance of strategic partnerships between disability-focused organisations, drawing on her research in Cox’s Bazar. Sherin Alsheikh Ahmed describes Islamic Relief Worldwide’s approach to mainstreaming protection and inclusion, while Pauline Thivillier and Valentina Shafina outline IRC’s Client Responsive Programming. The edition ends with reflections by Mirela Turcanu and Yves Ngunzi Kahashi on CAFOD’s SADI approach.

The new COVID-19 poor and the neglected tropical diseases resurgence

Infectious Diseases of Poverty
http://www.idpjournal.com/content
[Accessed 30 Jan 2021]

 

Editorial
The new COVID-19 poor and the neglected tropical diseases resurgence
Authors: Peter J. Hotez, Alan Fenwick and David Molyneux
Content type:
29 January 2021
More than 100 million people are facing a return to extreme poverty because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while new estimates suggest that three nations—India, Nigeria, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo—may suffer the greatest economic contractions. Such findings will have profound consequences in terms of our ability to control or eliminate the most widely prevalent neglected tropical diseases.

Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research

International Journal of Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 6, December 2020
https://academic.oup.com/ije/issue

 

Opinion
Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research
Sherri Rose
International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 49, Issue 6, December 2020, Pages 1763–1770, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa035

National Trends in the US Public’s Likelihood of Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine—April 1 to December 8, 2020

JAMA
January 26, 2021, Vol 325, No. 4, Pages 323-408
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/currentissue

 

Research Letter
National Trends in the US Public’s Likelihood of Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine—April 1 to December 8, 2020
Peter G. Szilagyi, MD, MPH; Kyla Thomas, PhD; Megha D. Shah, MD, MPH, MS; et al.
free access has active quiz
JAMA. 2021;325(4):396-398. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.26419
This internet survey study describes trends in respondents saying they were likely to accept vaccination for COVID-19 overall and by age, sex, race, and education between April and December 2020.

Addressing the medicines access challenge through balance, evidence, collaboration and transparency: key take-away lessons of the 4th PPRI Conference

Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/
[Accessed 30 Jan 2021]

 

Commentary
Addressing the medicines access challenge through balance, evidence, collaboration and transparency: key take-away lessons of the 4th PPRI Conference
Authors: Sabine Vogler, Nina Zimmermann, Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, Reinhard Busse, Jaime Espin, Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Dimitra Panteli, Fatima Suleman and Veronika J. Wirtz
25 January 2021

Estimating the health impact of vaccination against ten pathogens in 98 low-income and middle-income countries from 2000 to 2030: a modelling study

The Lancet
Jan 30, 2021 Volume 397 Number 10272 p347-444
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/issue/current

 

Articles
Estimating the health impact of vaccination against ten pathogens in 98 low-income and middle-income countries from 2000 to 2030: a modelling study
Xiang Li, et al for the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium
Open Access
Summary
Background
The past two decades have seen expansion of childhood vaccination programmes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We quantify the health impact of these programmes by estimating the deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted by vaccination against ten pathogens in 98 LMICs between 2000 and 2030.
Methods
16 independent research groups provided model-based disease burden estimates under a range of vaccination coverage scenarios for ten pathogens: hepatitis B virus, Haemophilus influenzae type B, human papillomavirus, Japanese encephalitis, measles, Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, rubella, and yellow fever. Using standardised demographic data and vaccine coverage, the impact of vaccination programmes was determined by comparing model estimates from a no-vaccination counterfactual scenario with those from a reported and projected vaccination scenario. We present deaths and DALYs averted between 2000 and 2030 by calendar year and by annual birth cohort.
Findings
We estimate that vaccination of the ten selected pathogens will have averted 69 million (95% credible interval 52–88) deaths between 2000 and 2030, of which 37 million (30–48) were averted between 2000 and 2019. From 2000 to 2019, this represents a 45% (36–58) reduction in deaths compared with the counterfactual scenario of no vaccination. Most of this impact is concentrated in a reduction in mortality among children younger than 5 years (57% reduction [52–66]), most notably from measles. Over the lifetime of birth cohorts born between 2000 and 2030, we predict that 120 million (93–150) deaths will be averted by vaccination, of which 58 million (39–76) are due to measles vaccination and 38 million (25–52) are due to hepatitis B vaccination. We estimate that increases in vaccine coverage and introductions of additional vaccines will result in a 72% (59–81) reduction in lifetime mortality in the 2019 birth cohort.
Interpretation
Increases in vaccine coverage and the introduction of new vaccines into LMICs have had a major impact in reducing mortality. These public health gains are predicted to increase in coming decades if progress in increasing coverage is sustained.
Funding
Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

COVID-19 is a marathon, not a sprint

Nature Human Behaviour
Volume 5 Issue 1, January 2021
https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/volumes/5/issues/1

 

Editorial | 20 January 2021
COVID-19 is a marathon, not a sprint
The COVID-19 pandemic rendered 2020 a year like no other in recent history. Although 2021 starts hopeful—with COVID-19 vaccines already being rolled out in more than 30 countries—the fight against the pandemic is far from over.

Coping with cascading collective traumas in the United States

Nature Human Behaviour
Volume 5 Issue 1, January 2021
https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/volumes/5/issues/1

 

Comment | 26 October 2020
Coping with cascading collective traumas in the United States
The year 2020 has been marked by unprecedented cascading traumas, including the COVID-19 pandemic, an economic recession, race-driven social unrest and weather-related disasters. Mental health consequences of direct and media-based exposure to compounding stressors may be profound. Policymakers must act to ease the burden of trauma to protect public health.
Roxane Cohen Silver, E. Alison Holman & Dana Rose Garfin

The differential impact of pediatric COVID-19 between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of fatality and ICU admission in children worldwide

PLoS One
http://www.plosone.org/
[Accessed 30 Jan 2021]

 

The differential impact of pediatric COVID-19 between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of fatality and ICU admission in children worldwide
Taito Kitano, Mao Kitano, Carsten Krueger, Hassan Jamal, Hatem Al Rawahi, Rachelle Lee-Krueger, Rose Doulin Sun, Sandra Isabel, Marta Taida García-Ascaso, Hiromi Hibino, Bettina Camara, Marc Isabel, Leanna Cho, Helen E. Groves, Pierre-Philippe Piché-Renaud, Michael Kossov, Ikuho Kou, Ilsu Jon, Ana C. Blanchard, Nao Matsuda, Quenby Mahood, Anupma Wadhwa, Ari Bitnun, Shaun K. Morris
Research Article | published 29 Jan 2021 PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246326

Global Public Health Database Support to Population-Based Management of Pandemics and Global Public Health Crises, Part I: The Concept

Prehospital & Disaster Medicine
Volume 36 – Issue 1 – February 2021
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine/latest-issue

 

Special Report
Global Public Health Database Support to Population-Based Management of Pandemics and Global Public Health Crises, Part I: The Concept
Frederick M. Burkle, David A. Bradt, Benjamin J. Ryan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2020, pp. 95-104

Global Public Health Database Support to Population-Based Management of Pandemics and Global Public Health Crises, Part II: The Database

Prehospital & Disaster Medicine
Volume 36 – Issue 1 – February 2021
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine/latest-issue

 

Global Public Health Database Support to Population-Based Management of Pandemics and Global Public Health Crises, Part II: The Database
Frederick M. Burkle, David A. Bradt, Joseph Green, Benjamin J. Ryan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2020, pp. 105-110

Does High Public Trust Amplify Compliance with Stringent COVID-19 Government Health Guidelines? A Multi-country Analysis Using Data from 102,627 Individuals

Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
https://www.dovepress.com/risk-management-and-healthcare-policy-archive56
[Accessed 30 Jan 2021]

 

Original Research
Does High Public Trust Amplify Compliance with Stringent COVID-19 Government Health Guidelines? A Multi-country Analysis Using Data from 102,627 Individuals
Pak A, McBryde E, Adegboye OA
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2021, 14:293-302
Published Date: 26 January 2021
Abstract
Purpose: To examine how public trust mediates the people’s adherence to levels of stringent government health policies and to establish if these effects vary across the political regimes.
Methods: This study utilizes data from two large-scale surveys: the global behaviors and perceptions at the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). Linear regression models were used to estimate the effects of public trust and strictness of restriction measures on people’s compliance level. The model accounted for individual and daily variations in country-level stringency of preventative measures. Differences in the dynamics between public trust, the stringent level of government health guidelines and policy compliance were also examined among countries based on political regimes.
Results: We find strong evidence of the increase in compliance due to the imposition of stricter government restrictions. The examination of heterogeneous effects suggests that high public trust in government and the perception of its truthfulness double the impact of policy restrictions on public compliance. Among political regimes, higher levels of public trust significantly increase the predicted compliance as stringency level rises in authoritarian and democratic countries.
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of public trust in government and its institutions during public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results are relevant and help understand why governments need to address the risks of non-compliance among low trusting individuals to achieve the success of the containment policies.

Science, civics, and democracy

Science
29 January 2021 Vol 371, Issue 6528
http://www.sciencemag.org/current.dtl

 

EDITORIAL
Science, civics, and democracy
Michael J. Feuer is Dean of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development and a professor at The George Washington University and is the Immediate Past President of The National Academy of Education, Washington, DC, USA.
mjfeuer@email.gwu.edu
Summary
Will the inauguration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris—a transition made “orderly” with barbed wire, National Guard soldiers, and the closure of downtown Washington, D.C.—be remembered as an inflection point? After 4 years of boorish incivility, incendiary nativist extremism, a crippling pandemic, resurgent racism, and riotous mobs incited to attack the Capitol, can the United States rebuild its civic and moral infrastructure? To repair the damage and prepare the next generation of citizens and leaders requires a new spirit of cooperation between the science and civics education communities.

HPV Vaccine Promotion: The church as an agent of change

Social Science & Medicine
Volume 268 January 2021
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/social-science-and-medicine/vol/268/suppl/C

 

Research article Full text access
HPV Vaccine Promotion: The church as an agent of change
Ariana Y. Lahijani, Adrian R. King, Mary M. Gullatte, Monique Hennink, Robert A. Bednarczyk
Article 113375
Highlights
:: Tailored behavior change strategies are needed to increase HPV vaccination coverage.
:: Collaboration with faith communities maximizes social capital for vaccine promotion.
:: Church-based interventions may reduce HPV-associated cancer rates.

A mapping of facilitators and barriers to evidence-based management in health systems: a scoping review study

Systematic Reviews
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles
[Accessed 30 Jan 2021]

 

https://stm.sciencemag.org/
Research
A mapping of facilitators and barriers to evidence-based management in health systems: a scoping review study
Healthcare settings are complex, and the decision-making process is usually complicated, too. Precise use of best evidence from different sources for increasing the desired outcomes is the result of EBM.
Authors: Tahereh Shafaghat, Mohammad Hasan Imani Nasab, Mohammad Amin Bahrami, Zahra Kavosi, Mahsa Roozrokh Arshadi Montazer, Mohammad Kazem Rahimi Zarchi and Peivand Bastani
Citation: Systematic Reviews 2021 10:42
Published on: 30 January 2021

Continued HPV vaccination in the face of unexpected challenges: A commentary on the rationale for an extended interval two-dose schedule

Vaccine
Volume 39, Issue 6 Pages 865-1024 (5 February 2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/39/issue/6

 

Discussion No access
Continued HPV vaccination in the face of unexpected challenges: A commentary on the rationale for an extended interval two-dose schedule
Hilary S. Whitworth, John Schiller, Lauri E. Markowitz, Mark Jit, … Deborah Watson-Jones
Pages 871-875

Immunogenicity, duration of protection, effectiveness and safety of rubella containing vaccines: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Vaccine
Volume 39, Issue 6 Pages 865-1024 (5 February 2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/39/issue/6

 

Review article Abstract only
Immunogenicity, duration of protection, effectiveness and safety of rubella containing vaccines: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Jossy van den Boogaard, Brechje de Gier, Priscila de Oliveira Bressane Lima, Shalini Desai, … Irene K. Veldhuijzen
Pages 889-900

Healthcare Workers’ (HCWs) attitudes towards mandatory influenza vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Vaccine
Volume 39, Issue 6 Pages 865-1024 (5 February 2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/39/issue/6

 

Review article Abstract only
Healthcare Workers’ (HCWs) attitudes towards mandatory influenza vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Maria Rosaria Gualano, Alessio Corradi, Gianluca Voglino, Dario Catozzi, … Roberta Siliquini
Pages 901-914

Effect of educational and financial incentive-based interventions on immunization attitudes, beliefs, intentions and receipt among close contacts of pregnant women

Vaccine
Volume 39, Issue 6 Pages 865-1024 (5 February 2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/39/issue/6

 

Research article Abstract only
Effect of educational and financial incentive-based interventions on immunization attitudes, beliefs, intentions and receipt among close contacts of pregnant women
Matthew Z. Dudley, Michael S. Taitel, Renae Smith-Ray, Tanya Singh, … Daniel A. Salmon

Vaccine coverage in children born to migrant mothers in Australia: A population-based cohort study

Vaccine
Volume 39, Issue 6 Pages 865-1024 (5 February 2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/39/issue/6

 

Research article Abstract only
Vaccine coverage in children born to migrant mothers in Australia: A population-based cohort study
Ikram Abdi, Heather Gidding, Robert Neil Leong, Hannah C. Moore, … Robert Menzies
Pages 984-993

Effect of provider recommendation style on the length of adolescent vaccine discussions

Vaccine
Volume 39, Issue 6 Pages 865-1024 (5 February 2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/39/issue/6

 

Research article Abstract only
Effect of provider recommendation style on the length of adolescent vaccine discussions
Anny T.H.R. Fenton, Chelsea Orefice, Terresa J. Eun, Dea Biancarelli, … Rebecca B. Perkins
Pages 1018-1023

Internet Survey of Awareness and Behavior Related to HPV Vaccination in Japan

Vaccines — Open Access Journal
http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccines
(Accessed 30 Jan 2021)

 

Open Access Article
Internet Survey of Awareness and Behavior Related to HPV Vaccination in Japan
by Risa Kudo et a;
Vaccines 2021, 9(2), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020087 – 25 Jan 2021
Abstract
Recommendations for HPV vaccines were suspended in 2013 due to unfounded safety fears in Japan. We aimed to clarify the differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated females in their awareness, knowledge, and behaviors toward cervical cancer, HPV vaccination and sex. Questionnaires were administered online […]

Media/Policy Watch

Media/Policy Watch
This watch section is intended to alert readers to substantive news, analysis and opinion from the general media and selected think tanks and similar organizations on vaccines, immunization, global public health and related themes. Media Watch is not intended to be exhaustive, but indicative of themes and issues CVEP is actively tracking. This section will grow from an initial base of newspapers, magazines and blog sources, and is segregated from Journal Watch above which scans the peer-reviewed journal ecology.
We acknowledge the Western/Northern bias in this initial selection of titles and invite suggestions for expanded coverage. We are conservative in our outlook in adding news sources which largely report on primary content we are already covering above. Many electronic media sources have tiered, fee-based subscription models for access. We will provide full-text where content is published without restriction, but most publications require registration and some subscription level.

 

The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
[No new, unique, relevant content]

 

BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
[No new, unique, relevant content]

 

The Economist
http://www.economist.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
[No new, unique, relevant content]

 

Financial Times
https://www.ft.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
Coronavirus treatment
EU pledges vaccine controls will not hit UK supplies
Von der Leyen vows BioNTech/Pfizer orders from Belgium will not be disrupted during tense call with Johnson
30 Jan 2021
Ursula von der Leyen has promised Boris Johnson that future EU controls on vaccines will not disrupt contracted supplies of the Belgian-made BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine to Britain.
The European Commission president made the commitment to the prime minister in a tense Friday night call, which followed the Commission’s controversial plan — hastily abandoned — to impose emergency border controls on vaccines entering Northern Ireland from the EU.
Ms von der Leyen tweeted that the talks with Mr Johnson had been “constructive”, adding: “We agreed on the principle that there should not be restrictions on the export of vaccines by companies where they are fulfilling contractual responsibilities.”…

Covid-19 vaccines
Moderna cuts deliveries to Italy and France in new blow to EU vaccination plans
…Vaccine manufacturer Moderna has told Italy and France it will deliver fewer doses than expected in February, in another blow to struggling coronavirus vaccination plans in the EU…
January 29, 2021

Explainer Coronavirus treatment
Brussels publishes EU-AstraZeneca vaccine contract
…Brussels has published its coronavirus vaccine contract with AstraZeneca in the latest gambit in the escalating row between the two over a delivery shortfall. The company agreed to disclose a redacted…
January 29, 2021

Top of Form
Bottom of Form

 

Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
Breaking  |
6 hours ago
Vaccine Plan For Gitmo Paused After Outrage From Republicans
Vaccinations could have started next week, according to reports.
By Nicholas Reimann Forbes Staff

7 hours ago
Vaccination Passports Set To Happen–But Are They Fair?
Vaccination or Immunity passports seem like the logical next step after negative Covid-19 tests to get the travel sector up and running, and they look set to happen–but are they ethical?
By Alex Ledsom Senior Contributor

Breaking  |
Jan 29, 2021
WHO: Vaccine Hoarding Would Be A “Catastrophic Moral Failure” That Keeps “Pandemic Burning”
The WHO said that affluent countries “fighting over the cake” are in danger of neglecting frontline health workers in developing countries that “don’t even have access to the crumbs.”
By Tommy Beer Forbes Staff

 

Foreign Affairs
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
Snapshot January 28, 2021
Why the World Lost to the Pandemic
Two new developments have exacerbated the impact of and response to the pandemic: politicization and securitization.
Yanzhong Huang

 

Foreign Policy
http://foreignpolicy.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
Argument
Europe’s Vaccine Disaster Isn’t Lack of Supply
As the EU tries to acquire more vaccines, it’s failing to effectively use the ones it already has.
Jacob Funk Kirkegaard

Argument
The Global Vaccine Rollout Is Failing—and That Puts Everyone, Everywhere, In Danger
The selfish reasons the United States and Europe must help poor countries deal with COVID-19.
By Jonathan Tepperman
| January 28, 2021

Argument
Blocking Undocumented Immigrants From Vaccination Is Self-Sabotage
A crucial and vulnerable population needs rapid access to the COVID-19 vaccine.
By Eillen Martinez, Zackary Berger
| January 28, 2021

 

The Guardian
http://www.guardiannews.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
WHO urges Britain to pause Covid jabs after treating vulnerable
The World Health Organization has urged the UK to pause its vaccination programme after vulnerable groups have received their jabs to help ensure the global rollout of doses is fair.
Boris Johnson has said he aims to offer all adults in the UK a first dose by autumn. However, the WHO said countries should be aiming for 2bn doses to be “fairly distributed” around the world by the end of 2021.
A WHO spokeswoman, Margaret Harris, said she wanted to appeal to people in the UK, telling them: “You can wait” because ensuring equitable global distribution is “clearly morally the right thing to do”…

 

New Yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
Q. & A.
Why Rich Countries Should Subsidize Vaccination Around the World
The economists Selva Demiralp and Muhammed A. Yildirim say there is an economic as well as a moral case for getting COVID-19 vaccines into the arms of the world’s people.
By Isaac Chotiner 6:00 A.M.

 

New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
World
Tanzania’s president says ‘vaccines don’t work,’ earning a rebuff from the W.H.O.
By Abdi Latif Dahir Jan. 28

World
Germany says vaccine shortages are likely to last another 10 weeks, and other news from around the world.
By Melissa Eddy, Richard C. Paddock, Javier C. Hernández, Mike Ives and Amy Chang Chien Jan. 28

Asia Pacific
To Avoid an Outbreak, China Cancels Lunar New Year for Millions of Migrants
China has added restrictions, offered incentives and appealed to a sense of filial and national responsibility, in an effort to prevent about 300 million migrant workers from going home for the holiday.
By Javier C. Hernández and Alexandra Stevenson Jan. 28

 

Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
Algeria starts COVID-19 vaccination drive with Russian shots
Associated Press · Jan 30, 2021

Think Tanks et al

Think Tanks et al

Brookings
http://www.brookings.edu/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
TechStream
Building robust and ethical vaccination verification systems
Baobao Zhang, Laurin Weissinger, Johannes Himmelreich, Nina McMurry, Tiffany Li, Naomi Schinerman, and Sarah Kreps
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
 
 
Center for Global Development [to 30 Jan 2021]
http://www.cgdev.org/page/press-center
How to Make COVID-19 Vaccination a Success? Policy Priorities and Implementation from Israel and Around the World
Event 1/26/21
This panel of renowned experts will discuss policy options and strategies for expedited mass vaccination, the extent the current lockdowns support these strategies while impacting the economy, and what constitutes real success – and ultimately victory – over the virus around the globe.
 
 
Chatham House [to 30 Jan 2021]
https://www.chathamhouse.org/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
[No new relevant content]

 
 
CSIS
https://www.csis.org/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
Transcript
Online Event: Trusting a COVID-19 Vaccine: The Role of the Media and Misinformation
January 29, 2021

On Demand Event
Online Event: The State of Immunization Under Covid-19
January 29, 2021

Commentary
Vaccine Diplomacy Is Biden’s First Test in Southeast Asia
January 28, 2021 | By Gregory B. Poling, Simon Tran Hudes

 

Council on Foreign Relations
http://www.cfr.org/
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
[No new relevant content]

 

Kaiser Family Foundation
https://www.kff.org/search/?post_type=press-release
Accessed 30 Jan 2021
January 27, 2021 News Release
Vaccine Monitor: Nearly Half of the Public Wants to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine as Soon as They Can or Has Already Been Vaccinated, Up across Racial and Ethnic Groups Since December
Most Convincing Messages to Promote Vaccination Highlight Effectiveness at Preventing Illness and a Return to Normal Life; Hearing about Rare Allergic Reactions and Side Effects May Discourage Some New KFF Dashboard Features Key Data and Insights from the Vaccine Monitor With millions of Americans getting their first COVID-19 vaccinations, the…

World Economic Forum [to 30 Jan 2021]
https://agenda.weforum.org/news/
Media
Cooperation Vital to Uphold as Pandemic Challenges Continue
News 29 Jan 2021

Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review :: 23 January 2021

Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review is a weekly digest  summarizing news, events, announcements, peer-reviewed articles and research in the global vaccine ethics and policy space. Content is aggregated from key governmental, NGO, international organization and industry sources, key peer-reviewed journals, and other media channels. This summary proceeds from the broad base of themes and issues monitored by the Center for Vaccine Ethics & Policy in its work: it is not intended to be exhaustive in its coverage. You are viewing the blog version of our weekly digest, typically comprised of between 30 and 40 posts below all dated with the current issue date

.– Request an Email Summary: Vaccines and Global Health : The Week in Review is published as a single email summary, scheduled for release each Saturday evening before midnight (EDT in the U.S.). If you would like to receive the email version, please send your request to david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org.

– pdf version A pdf of the current issue is available here: 

– blog edition: comprised of the approx. 35+ entries posted below.

– Twitter:  Readers can also follow developments on twitter: @vaxethicspolicy.
.
– Links:  We endeavor to test each link as we incorporate it into any post, but recognize that some links may become “stale” as publications and websites reorganize content over time. We apologize in advance for any links that may not be operative. We believe the contextual information in a given post should allow retrieval, but please contact us as above for assistance if necessary.

Support this knowledge-sharing service: Your financial support helps us cover our costs and to address a current shortfall in our annual operating budget. Click here to donate and thank you in advance for your contribution.

.
David R. Curry, MS
Executive Director
Center for Vaccine Ethics and Policy

WHO – 148th session of the Executive Board EB148

WHO – 148th session of the Executive Board EB148

18-26 January 2021

:: Webcast

:: Main Documents

:: EB148/1 Rev.1   Agenda
:: EB148/1(annotated)  Provisional agenda (annotated)

[Editor’s Note: EB148 continues through 26 January 2021. In our next edition we will provide key resolutions/ decisions/updates]

::::::

Statement to the 148th Executive Board by the Chair of the Review Committee on the Functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) during the COVID-19 Response

Professor Lothar H. Wieler, President of the Robert Koch Institute, Germany

19 January 2021   Statement

…Thank you once again for the opportunity to provide you with an update on the work of the Review Committee on the Functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) during COVID-19.

As you know, this Committee was convened by the Director-General on 8 September 2020, in line with World Health Assembly Resolution WHA73.1. The Committee is composed of experts with a wide range of expertise and with adequate gender and geographical representation. I have the honour to be the Chair of this Committee and am ably supported by our Vice-Chair, Professor Lucille Blumberg of South Africa and our Rapporteur, Professor Preben Aavitsland, from Norway.

Our mandate is to review the functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) during the COVID-19 response and the status of implementation of the relevant recommendations of previous IHR Review Committees and to make technical recommendations to the Director-General, including any potential amendments.

We convened for 16 closed meetings so far, and we continue to work through three sub-groups: preparedness, alert, and response. I take this opportunity to reiterate my thanks to our three subgroup leads. We also convened 5 open meetings, when we provided updates on our work and listened to the submissions and questions raised by Member States, international agencies and non-governmental organizations in official relation to WHO. These open meetings continue to be attended by numerous designated representatives.

I reported on our progress to the 73rd World Health Assembly on 9 November 2020. And I continue to interact regularly with the Co-Chairs of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response and the Chair of the Independent Oversight Advisory Committee.

Let me now turn to the substance of our work. I invite you to read our Interim Progress Report, document EB148/19. It details our preliminary findings as of December 2020, which were reached following numerous interviews, discussions and the review of a wealth of documentation.

Let me point out the most important ones:

[1] Member States and experts overwhelmingly support the IHR as a cornerstone of international public health and health security law, but several areas need improving if we are to be better prepared for the next pandemic. While we have not finalized our article-by-article assessment, there is a growing belief in the Committee that most of the necessary improvements can be achieved through more effective implementation of the existing provisions of the IHR, and do not require at this point changes to the design of the IHR.

[2] National IHR Focal Points need to be further empowered, including where necessary through national legislation. National Focal Points play a critical role in the timely sharing of information, but their limited authority and status often lead to delays in notification. The Committee noted that effective IHR implementation requires many functions that are not within the narrow mandate of the national IHR focal points, such as multisectoral coordination for preparedness and response and collaborative risk assessment. The absence of a dedicated national entity with sufficient authority and a clear mandate to take ownership and leadership is considered a significant limitation to effective implementation of the IHR at national and subnational levels. At country level, national IHR focal points need to be integrated in the national emergency plan as well as the national health committee or similar body.

[3] The possible need for an intermediate level of alert before a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) is declared, is also under consideration. The previous review committee on the Ebola response recommended such an intermediate level, but this recommendation was not taken up. The 5th open meeting of the Committee on 12 January 2021 discussed issues surrounding the possible introduction of a grading system. The different views expressed by Member States and the advantages and potential disadvantages of a new system will be further studied by the Committee. It is clear, that global preparedness, alert and response actions need to start much earlier and more decisively than they did during COVID-19. But it is far from certain, that introducing an intermediate level of alert would result in such earlier action. The Committee is considering how regular global and regional risk assessments can be used better to drive earlier and more targeted response measures at all levels. The aim, the Committee feels, should be to react early and strongly enough so as to prevent the need to declare a PHEIC.

[4] Compliance with IHR provisions remains a challenge in several areas, from setting up core capacities to implementing travel measures during health emergencies. The Committee is mindful of the lack of teeth in the IHR. We are therefore looking at new ways to monitoring and evaluating adherence to the IHR – both in preparedness and response – and to strengthen existing tools without overburdening countries. Considering a peer-review mechanism similar to the Universal Periodic Review used by the Human Rights Council, may be useful in improving preparedness and response. For example, the Universal Periodic Review has been shown to foster intersectoral coordination and whole-of-government approaches, to encourage good practices, and to link implementation of its recommendations with other government agendas – all of which are vital to strengthening IHR implementation. It is in this context that the Director-General has proposed the Universal Health and Preparedness Review initiative which is currently being pilot tested.

[5] Last but far from least, political support and resources for IHR implementation remain insufficient and irregular at all levels. In this context, the Committee is awaiting further detailed information on the funding mechanisms for IHR implementation.

I would like to clearly state my conviction that we need more meaningful cooperation during and in-between health emergencies; more transparency, more regular detailed exchange of real-time data and experiences at all levels, more reliability of interaction, and greater speed in sharing data and samples. Fortunately, digital technology supporting such developments is increasingly becoming available, from data mining to find disease outbreaks early, to next generation sequencing to follow a pathogen around the globe, to virtual conferencing that makes human interaction easier.

To come to the conclusion, the deadline for our final report is the 74th World Health Assembly in May 2021. However, as we all know, the COVID-19 pandemic will be far from over in 4 months’ time, and therefore our findings and recommendations will not necessarily be complete. Further deliberations may be needed later…

Global Burden of Animal Diseases

Milestones :: Perspectives :: Research

 

Global Burden of Animal Diseases

Launch of the multi-year, multi-partner Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme
Animal health leaders and researchers from the Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme have secured US$7 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, to rollout a framework on measuring animal health burdens and their impacts on human lives and economies. The information provided by GBADs will guide public policy and private sector strategy, contributing to improve animal health and welfare more effectively. It will also be a basis for further academic research.

Paris,19 January 2021 – Across the world, livestock production and aquaculture are critical to human nutrition and health. These animals play critical roles in society, providing income and food, but also clothing, building materials, fertilizer and draught power. However, the presence of endemic and emerging diseases, as well as other factors, negatively impact them, jeopardising their contributions.

 

Every year, hundreds of millions of dollars are invested globally on disease mitigation in order to improve livestock health and productivity. Yet, a systematic way to determine the burden of animal disease on the health and wellbeing of people is not available. It is still unknown how the burden is apportioned between smallholders and the commercial sector, or across regions and gender. Consequently, decision makers lack the information to accurately assess whether their investments target the animal health issues that have the most significant impact on human wellbeing.

Measure to improve the management of animal diseases: A new programme
The GBADs programme, led by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the University of Liverpool, and a partnership of international institutions, will enable the examination of animal health and the disease burden from a different perspective. By assessing the global burden in economic terms, the programme will help identify the individuals and communities which are the most impacted, demonstrating how animal health is intrinsically linked to agricultural productivity, smallholder household income, the empowerment of women and the equitable provision of a safe, affordable, nutritious diet.

“It is more evident now for everyone that animal health and public health are interconnected and play an essential role in building a sustainable and healthy planet. Especially, if we succeed in incorporating the environmental and socioeconomic components”, said Dr Monique Eloit, OIE Director General.

“The GBADs programme is a key part of our commitment to deploying our research capacity toward the welfare of humankind. The GBADs programme is crucial in building a world with zero hunger, good health, and equality for all, an urgent mission in which we are proud to play our part. We are grateful for the support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, who are supporting this work in partnership with the OIE. Together, we will realise a brighter future for animal and human wellbeing”, highlighted professor Dame Janet Beer, Vice-Chancellor, University of Liverpool.

The new partnership announced today will support the implementation of the GBADs programme. In a world where 1.25 billion people work in agriculture, this programme will have a positive impact on the Sustainable Development Goals contributing to Zero Hunger, Good Health and Well-being, Gender Equality; Decent Work and Economic Growth; and Responsible Consumption and Production.

NOTES FOR THE EDITOR:
GBADs is led by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the University of Liverpool, and a partnership of international institutions including: the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Australia; University of Guelph, Canada; the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, United States; the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Ethiopia; Murdoch University, Australia; Sciensano, Belgium; Washington State University, United States; University of Zurich, Switzerland; and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

The GBADs programme has also received funding from the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Brooke and DG-Sante European Commission.
ACIAR has supported a feasibility study in Indonesia leading to proposal submission for a multi-year case study.

Brooke is a global animal welfare organisation which uses international development approaches to improve the lives of working livestock and the people who rely on them. As part of the GBAD project, Brooke is funding and co-supervising a four-year PhD study on ‘Burden of Animal Diseases of Working Equids’, together with the University of Liverpool. DG-Sante is responsible for the European Union Commission’s policies on health and food safety and will support GBADs case studies in the European Region in 2021.

COVAX announces new agreement, plans for first deliveries

Milestones :: Perspectives :: Research

 

COVID – COVAX

COVAX announces new agreement, plans for first deliveries
:: COVAX announced the signing of an advance purchase agreement for up to 40 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine; rollout to commence with successful execution of supply agreements

:: Additionally, COVAX announced that, pending WHO emergency use listings, nearly 150 million doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford candidate are anticipated to be available in Q1 2021, via existing agreements with the Serum Institute of India (SII) and AstraZeneca

:: COVAX is therefore on track to deliver at least 2 billion doses by the end of the year, including at least 1.3 billion doses to 92 lower income economies in the Gavi COVAX AMC

:: Click here for the latest COVAX supply forecast
[Editor’s text-bolding]
Geneva/Oslo 22 January 2021 – COVAX, the global initiative to ensure rapid and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for all countries, regardless of income level, today announced the signing of an advance purchase agreement with Pfizer for up to 40 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine candidate, which has already received WHO Emergency Use Listing. Rollout will commence with the successful negotiation and execution of supply agreements.

In further support of its mission to expedite early availability of vaccines to lower-income countries and help bring a rapid end to the acute stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVAX also confirmed today that it will exercise an option – via an existing agreement with Serum Institute of India (SII) – to receive its first 100 million doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford University-developed vaccine manufactured by SII.

Of these first 100 million doses, the majority are earmarked for delivery in the first quarter of the year, pending WHO Emergency Use Listing. The WHO review process, which is currently underway, follows approval for restricted use in emergency situations by the Drugs Controller General of India earlier this month, and is a critical aspect of ensuring that any vaccine procured through COVAX is fully quality assured. According to the latest WHO update, a decision on this vaccine candidate is anticipated in the middle of February at the earliest.

COVAX also anticipates that, via an existing agreement with AstraZeneca, at least 50 million further doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine will be available for delivery to COVAX participants in Q1 2021, pending regulatory approval by the WHO of the COVAX-specific manufacturing network for these doses. A decision on this candidate is anticipated by WHO in the second half of February at the earliest.

“Today marks another milestone for COVAX: pending regulatory approval for the AstraZeneca/Oxford candidate and the successful conclusion of the supply agreement for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, we expect to be able to begin deliveries of life-saving COVID-19 vaccines February. This is not just significant for COVAX, it is a major step forward for equitable access to vaccines, and an essential part of the global effort to beat this pandemic. We will only be safe anywhere if we are safe everywhere,” said Dr Seth Berkley, CEO of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, which leads COVAX procurement and delivery.

 

Preparations, led by WHO, UNICEF and Gavi, are already well under way for COVAX to deliver vaccines to economies eligible for support via the COVAX AMC, with Gavi making US$ 150 million available from its core funding as initial, catalytic support for preparedness and delivery.

“The urgent and equitable rollout of vaccines is not just a moral imperative, it’s also a strategic and economic imperative,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization. “This agreement with Pfizer will help to enable COVAX to save lives, stabilize health systems and drive the global economic recovery.”

Building on the work of the past months supporting country readiness efforts, a “Country Readiness Portal” will be launched by WHO this month, which will allow AMC participants to submit final national deployment and vaccination plans (NDVPs). This is a vital step before allocations can be made, to ensure that delivered doses are able to be effectively deployed and to identify where, if necessary, further support is needed.

“These purchase agreements open the door for these lifesaving vaccines to become available to people in the most vulnerable countries,” said UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore. “But at the same time we are securing vaccines we must also ensure that countries are ready to receive them, deploy them, and build trust in them.”

The COVAX Facility intends to provide all 190 participating economies with an indicative allocation of doses in one week’s time. This indicative allocation will provide interim guidance to participants – offering a minimum planning scenario to enable preparations for the final allocation of the number of doses each participant will receive.

 

Supply update
COVAX now has agreements in place to access just over two billion doses of several promising vaccine candidates. Negotiations continue for further doses to be secured through existing R&D agreements by COVAX co-lead the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), through evaluations of new products with promising results and through contributions from donors.

Based on this, COVAX anticipates being able to provide participating economies doses of safe and effective vaccines – enough to protect health care and other frontline workers as well as some high-risk individuals – beginning in Q1 2021. The aim is to protect at least 20% of each participating population by the end of the year – unless a participant has requested a lower percentage of doses. At least 1.3 billion of these doses will be made available to the 92 economies eligible for the Gavi COVAX AMC by the end of 2021.

To meet its goal of securing two billion safe and effective vaccines in 2021, COVAX has built a diverse portfolio of vaccine candidates which mitigates the risk of a product failing in the development process, and ensures availability of products suitable for various contexts and settings. This work will continue at pace to enable further supply of vaccines suitable for use across a wide range of populations and settings in 2021 and beyond.

“The progress in vaccine development so far has been extraordinary, and it is clear that we are now assembling the tools we need to bring the acute phase of the pandemic to an end. But we cannot afford to slow our efforts given the speed with which this pandemic continues to wreak havoc,” said Dr Richard Hatchett, CEO of CEPI. “The emergence of new variants of COVID-19 puts into sharp focus the need for us to be one step ahead of the virus by continuing to invest in vaccine R&D – specifically for next-generation vaccine candidates and to be ready for strain changes in existing vaccines – to ensure we have the tools to meet the needs of all populations in all countries for the long term.”

 

::::::

Remarks by Henrietta Fore, UNICEF Executive Director, at press briefing on COVAX
Statement as delivered
01/22/2021
“…“UNICEF is currently assessing a series of bids in the COVID-19 vaccine tender launched in November. We are negotiating long-term supply agreements with a number of manufacturers – agreements that will pave the way for the world’s poorest countries to access doses of quality-assured vaccines.
“As part of this effort, I’m pleased to announce that UNICEF has awarded Pfizer a contract following the tender, and we are now in discussions to finalize the supply agreement.
“Thanks to UNICEF’s negotiations and our decades of experience procuring and delivering vaccines in every corner of the world, we have the expertise and know-how to do the job.
“Although today represents a milestone moment, important challenges remain for the unprecedented logistical exercise of rolling out vaccines in every corner of the globe.
“UNICEF and our partners are working with governments around the clock to ensure that countries are ready to receive the vaccines, with appropriate cold chain equipment in place and health workers trained to dispense them. UNICEF is also playing a lead role in efforts to foster trust in vaccines by tracking and addressing misinformation.
“In the coming weeks, UNICEF will begin transporting vaccines, together with syringes and safety boxes, to countries around the world. We will work with airlines, and freight and logistics providers to ensure safe and timely delivery…”

Pfizer and BioNTech Reach Agreement with COVAX for Advance Purchase of Vaccine to Help Combat COVID-19

Milestones :: Perspectives :: Research

 

Pfizer and BioNTech Reach Agreement with COVAX for Advance Purchase of Vaccine to Help Combat COVID-19
:: Initial agreement provides up to 40 million doses to COVAX in 2021
:: First deliveries are expected to take place in Q1 2021 subject to the execution of supply agreements under the COVAX Facility structure
:: For the COVAX Advanced Market Commitment 92 countries, Pfizer and BioNTech will provide the vaccine to COVAX at a not-for-profit price.

January 22, 2021
NEW YORK & MAINZ, Germany–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Pfizer and BioNTech SE today announced an advance purchase agreement with COVAX for up to 40 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. The doses will be delivered throughout 2021.

COVAX is a global initiative coordinated by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the World Health Organization (WHO), to ensure equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for all countries, regardless of income levels. COVAX includes an Advanced Market Commitment (AMC) financial mechanism that aims to ensure that 92 low- and lower-middle-income countries will be able to secure access to COVID-19 vaccines at the same time as higher-income countries.

The first doses are expected to be delivered in the first quarter of 2021, subject to the negotiation and execution of supply agreements under the COVAX Facility structure.

For the COVAX Advanced Market Commitment 92 countries, Pfizer and BioNTech will provide the vaccine to COVAX at a not-for-profit price.

“At Pfizer, we believe that every person deserves to be seen, heard and cared for. That’s why from the very beginning of our vaccine development program, Pfizer and BioNTech have been firmly committed to working toward equitable and affordable access of COVID-19 vaccines for people around the world,” said Pfizer Chairman & CEO Albert Bourla. “We share the mission of COVAX and are proud to work together so that developing countries have the same access as the rest of the world, which will bring us another step closer to ending this global pandemic and proving that Science Will Win for everyone, everywhere.”…

ICMRA statement for healthcare professionals: How COVID-19 vaccines will be regulated for safety and effectiveness

Milestones :: Perspectives :: Research

 

ICMRA statement for healthcare professionals: How COVID-19 vaccines will be regulated for safety and effectiveness
Statement from the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities
EMA has endorsed the joint statement published today by the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) to inform and help healthcare professionals answer questions about the evaluation, approval and monitoring of safe, effective and high-quality COVID-19 vaccines.
Purpose
This International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) statement aims to inform and help healthcare professionals answer questions about the role of regulators in the oversight of COVID-19 vaccines.  It explains how vaccines undergo robust scientific evaluation to determine their safety, efficacy and quality and how safety will continue to be closely monitored after approval.
People who are not vaccinated remain at risk of spreading the virus. Herd immunity through vaccination occurs when the majority of population has been vaccinated and can no longer give the virus to others, hence protecting themselves as well as those who cannot be vaccinated.  Achieving ‘herd immunity’ and reducing the effective reproduction number of infection disease as much as possible is important.  If ‘herd immunity’ is not achieved by enough people being vaccinated this could seriously affect vulnerable people, including immunocompromised people who cannot receive vaccines, or those who respond poorly to vaccination and therefore are more readily infected. Herd immunity requires a combination of high vaccination coverage with vaccines that are both effective and provide a reasonable duration of protection.  Achieving ‘herd immunity’ will allow a return to normal societal functioning and re-opening of economies.
About ICMRA
ICMRA brings together the heads of 30 medicines regulatory authorities* from every region in the world, with the WHO as an observer.  Medicines regulators recognise their important role in facilitating the provision of access to safe and effective high-quality medicinal products that are essential to human health and well-being.  This includes ensuring that the benefits of vaccines outweigh their risks.

White House

Milestones :: Perspectives :: Research

 

White House

National Strategy for the COVID-19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness
January 2021 :: 200 pages
The American people deserve an urgent, robust, and professional response to the growing public health and economic crisis caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. President Biden believes that the federal government must act swiftly and aggressively to help protect and support our families, small businesses, first responders, and caregivers essential to help us face this challenge, those who are most vulnerable to health and economic impacts, and our broader communities – not to blame others or bail out corporations.
The Biden-Harris administration will always:
:: Listen to science
:: Ensure public health decisions are informed by public health professionals
:: Promote trust, transparency, common purpose, and accountability in our government
Plan PDF: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/National-Strategy-for-the-COVID-19-Response-and-Pandemic-Preparedness.pdf

 

::::::

Executive Order on Establishing the COVID-19 Pandemic Testing Board and Ensuring a Sustainable Public Health Workforce for COVID-19 and Other Biological Threats
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

Readout of Vice President Harris’s Call with World Health Organization Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

National Security Directive on United States Global Leadership to Strengthen the International COVID-19 Response and to Advance Global Health Security and Biological Preparedness
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions
… Section 1.  Strengthening and Reforming the World Health Organization.  On January 20, 2021, the United States reversed its decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) by submitting a letter to the United Nations Secretary-General informing him of the President’s decision that the United States will remain a member of the organization.  Accordingly, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), the heads of other relevant executive departments and agencies (agencies), and the Coordinator of the COVID-19 Response and Counselor to the President (COVID-19 Response Coordinator), provide to the President within 30 days of the date of this directive recommendations on how the United States can:  (1) exercise leadership at the WHO and work with partners to lead and reinvigorate the international COVID-19 response; (2) participate in international efforts to advance global health, health security, and the prevention of future biological catastrophes; and (3) otherwise strengthen and reform the WHO…

Executive Order on Ensuring an Equitable Pandemic Response and Recovery
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

Executive Order on a Sustainable Public Health Supply Chain
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

Memorandum to Extend Federal Support to Governors’ Use of the National Guard to Respond to COVID-19 and to Increase Reimbursement and Other Assistance Provided to States
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

Executive Order on Ensuring a Data-Driven Response to COVID-19 and Future High-Consequence Public Health Threats
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

Executive Order on Improving and Expanding Access to Care and Treatments for COVID-19
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

Executive Order on Promoting COVID-19 Safety in Domestic and International Travel
January 21, 2021 • Presidential Actions

Executive Order on Organizing and Mobilizing the United States Government to Provide a Unified and Effective Response to Combat COVID-19 and to Provide United States Leadership on Global Health and Security
January 20, 2021 • Presidential Actions

 

::::::

Janet Woodcock M.D.
Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs – Food and Drug Administration
Janet Woodcock was named Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs on January 20, 2021.
As Acting Commissioner, Dr. Woodcock oversees the full breadth of the FDA portfolio and execution of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other applicable laws. This includes assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices; the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation; and the regulation of tobacco products…

Coronavirus [COVID-19] – WHO Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)

Milestones :: Perspectives :: Research

 

Coronavirus [COVID-19] – WHO
Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)

 

Weekly Epidemiological and Operational updates
Last update: 23 January 2021
Confirmed cases :: 96 877 399 [week ago: 92 506 811] [two weeks ago: 87 589 206]
Confirmed deaths :: 2 098 879 [week ago: 2 001 773] [two weeks ago: 1 906 606]
Countries, areas or territories with cases :: 224

19 January 2021
Weekly epidemiological update – 19 January 2021
Globally, 4.7 million new cases were reported in the past week, a decline of 6% from last week, and the number of new deaths has climbed to a record high at 93 000, a 9% increase from last week. This brings the cumulative numbers to over 93 million reported cases and over 2 million deaths globally since the start of the pandemic.
In this edition of the COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update, special focus updates are provided on: Children, COVID-19, and transmission in schools, as well as on SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

19 January 2021
Weekly operational update on COVID-19 – 19 January 2021

 

::::::

How contributions support WHO’s work in ongoing fight of COVID-19 pandemic around the world
22 January 2021

Governments push for Universal Health Coverage as COVID-19 continues to devastate communities and economies
18 January 2021